Oceans Yet to Burn
Month
So in the discussion over whether internet companies can deny hosting to Nazis (such as here and here), I admit I see both sides. I understand the concerns that this grants too much discretionary power to large establishments about what speech is allowed on the internet, and I understand that “Nazis marching in the streets with torches and the organizing thereof is different and inimical to civil society.”
My question is, can anyone offer an argument for why private companies should get to choose this?
Like on the anti-Nazi side, everything they say makes a case for why it should just be illegal to host this violent, reactionary rhetoric.
And on the pro-free-speech side, everything they say makes a case for why no gatekeeper is pure enough to decide who does and doesn’t get to speak.
But what’s the logic for “maybe Nazis get to organize online, maybe they don’t, and that decision should be up to the rich people who control internet companies?”
It goes like this:
“Nazis can do whatever they want on their own time but this is my server that I’ve purchased with my money so therefore it’s me that gets to decide what pages are hosted on it.”
It becomes significantly more cloudy when we get to registrars like godaddy. They are a government-monopoly-by-proxy through ICANN.
Limited Liability Corporations are government constructs that receive very powerful special protections (it’s in the name), and thus I don’t see it as the same as a personal server.
“Nearly 70 percent of children – all of whom suffered from peanut allergies –treated with a combination of probioticsand small doses of peanuts could safely consume the legume, even four years after receiving the eight-week-long treatment. Comparatively, only four percent of the children who received no treatment could eat peanuts without a reaction in the same timespan.
Lead researcher Mimi Tang pioneered the dual-therapy approach to treating peanut allergies, and she posits that probiotics – Lactobacillus rhamnosus was used in the study – increase the chances of cells responding to the immunotherapy.”
So in the discussion over whether internet companies can deny hosting to Nazis (such as here and here), I admit I see both sides. I understand the concerns that this grants too much discretionary power to large establishments about what speech is allowed on the internet, and I understand that “Nazis marching in the streets with torches and the organizing thereof is different and inimical to civil society.”
My question is, can anyone offer an argument for why private companies should get to choose this?
Like on the anti-Nazi side, everything they say makes a case for why it should just be illegal to host this violent, reactionary rhetoric.
And on the pro-free-speech side, everything they say makes a case for why no gatekeeper is pure enough to decide who does and doesn’t get to speak.
But what’s the logic for “maybe Nazis get to organize online, maybe they don’t, and that decision should be up to the rich people who control internet companies?”
I don’t like global governments because people in different countries have genuinely different cultures and mentalities and the exact same economic policy would not make much sense and will likely reduce efficiency
“Right-wing author to discuss new book - Eat, Sleep, Marry and Reproduce.”
silver-and-ivory said: marriage is natural! it’s a part of evolution
For a social species, there is always a great deal of room to argue over what counts as natural and what does not, but marriage customs definitely influence the gene pool and can therefore be considered part of evolution.
Speaking of which, if housing is cheap and public transit is good and cheap, and healthcare vouchers are issued, you don’t need a $15 minimum wage. However, suppose every worker must own a car, and the insufficient number of housing units constructed has resulted in massive bidding wars for the few units close to the city center…
This dual-citizenship debacle in the Australian parliament demonstrates how hard it can be to maintain a true rule of law, as formulating a set of rules that is both complete and consistent is impossible.
You might have a rule saying “members of parliament must renounce citizenship of any other countries” or words to that effect, but then you also need to have rules for what happens when they don’t renounce it, or think they’ve renounced it but actually haven’t, or it turns out that they have been dual-citizens and never realised and they’ve been in parliament for decades and passed tons of laws.
If it was a database you might try rolling back to a previously valid state, but a real world organisation faces the problem that there probably is no previous state that was ever truly valid, and that maintaining stable governance and predictable outcomes is considered more important than technical adherence to rules which can generate unpredictable behaviour.
This is why every practical organisational ecosystem needs to have a system like the courts for interpretation, mediation, and finding ad hoc fixes to problems that can’t be resolved any other way, while always doing their best to maintain adherence to precedent and being careful when establishing new precedent.
There are obvious ramifications to this for decentralised systems and those that attempt to make rule of law absolute, by baking it into (hopefully perfect) code.
I was going to make a joke about the issues of a computer law system having someone not fitting the code considered not to exist being an anime, but uh, such an anime already exists.
I mean, I’d prefer to address things by restricting reproduction rather than withholding life-saving treatment, but apparently that makes me Literally Hitler.
Hi, fellow supervillain here.
the politics of any country would be vastly improved if politicians were forced to commit seppuku in shame when they fuck up
The politics of any country would be greatly improved if the politicians had such a sense of shame when they fucked up that they committed seppuku on their own.
But if they had shame, would they still be politicians?
once they come, buildings get fixed, and people stop dying in the street
They stop dying in the street in that neighbourhood, while people in another begin dying.
The process of pushing a group of people from one area to the next doesn’t eliminate the problems that created that blight in the first place. It just becomes another, usually less equipped and more unprepared community’s problem. Gentrification isn’t an all-in-one solution, otherwise if it were, we wouldn’t be talking about it as some generally understood negative phenomenon. It is inherently exploitative and harms more than just the area of gentrification itself.
Even the girl in that first video admits her neighborhood is a shithole.
My personal living space is a shithole but it’s still home. similarly, this is why she is distraught at the changes to her home and the cultural force that is pushing her out.
cringy hipster culture that isn’t as cool and authentic as black culture
i try not to see things in terms of what’s “authentic” or “cool,” because at the very least, it commodifies tradition and culture as something to consumed or visited as part of a social trend.
It like, reduces it to a cultural zoo.
Contrary to popular beliefs, Tumblr actually plot to ensnare foreigners in bad American politics discourse, including bad American race discourse.
“Right-wing author to discuss new book - Eat, Sleep, Marry and Reproduce.”
when muslims get mad
the /real/ monument to Lee would be no monument at all
Fking Bruce Lee monument got up and walked away again. I don’t know why we even bother.
people who are like “but what if people decide I am a Nazi and punch ME”:
this is literally not how antifa works. there are not roving gangs of antifa traveling around being like “do you ship white-dude slash ships? PUNCH HIM IN THE FACE”
antifa do sometimes punch people who are not Nazis! specifically, if you are at a riot where antifa and nazis are fighting each other, some antifa might confuse you for a nazi and punch you. your political opinions LITERALLY DO NOT MATTER. antifa sometimes punch other members of antifa.
you can eliminate your risk of being punched by antifa to zero by avoiding riots. this is inconvenient for people who want to go to protests and for UC Berkeley students, but for most people this is not actually something you need to be worried about.
this post is intended to defend a specific claim not to go ANTIFA YAY. I am saying this because many people have responded by defending the claim ANTIFA BOO rather than arguing with anything in my post, and this is mildly annoying.
if we must know my opinion on ANTIFA BOO OR YAY I suppose I am on the BOO side, mostly because I prefer the sf bay area to be riot-free
Epistemic status: Too angry, I know.
One: Antifa (over here) have every incentive to make violence easier to use. They decrease accountability and seek plausible deniability. They legitimise violence as political discourse. They don’t incite violence for the thrill of it, but they actively recruit thrill-seekers, because squeamish, conscientous nerds don’t make for great rioters or street fighters.
Two: Have you ever missed work because somebody tampered with the railways? Have you ever missed work because somebody wanted you to miss work, because anti-capitalism? Has your little sister ever missed a doctor’s appointment in the city because anti-capitalists cut the power lines to the railway signals and she had to sit in the train for three hours? Has anybody ever lit your roommate’s car on fire parked two meters on front of your kitchen window?
Three: Miss me with that George-Bush-League collateral damage rhetoric.
Oh, hey, and they apparently did cut someone that was friendly to them and not at a riot recently.
Plus they try to get people that aren’t at riots, and in fact have no connection to WNs, fired.
So “not being at a riot” is insufficient to protect one from Antifa.
y’know it’s probably a good thing that hot takes/the discourse/outrage culture/that thing almost never picks up on an actually important issue because it means my web of denial about whether people I know support atrocities can remain unpunctured
Pineapple on pizza is morally wrong!
bluepilled: Believing the presence of xenoestrogens has had no impact whatsoever on the human population.
“redpilled”: Believing that xenoestrogens have created a generation of pathetic, wimpy, unmanly men, undermining the masculine dominance of Western society.
redpilled: Injecting testosterone into the water supply to turn the population more right-wing and manly, including the women.
Uh-oh, Anon is at their peak hormones today!
Honey darling, almost anything looks or sounds sexualized if you’re horny enough, so 90% of the time accusations that some random non-sexual object is sexual it’s just bullshit that’s in the eyes of the beholder.
I mean come on, how else do you think some of the fringeiest types started concluding that towers, concrete pillars, everything was “phallic” or phallocentric? I mean aside from that company selling those products.
wait a second isn’t every guy who watches porn basically a cuck
Does your girlfriend sending you nudes count as porn? What about watching a camgirl?
I’m envisioning a cuck spectrum, here.
@nihilsupernum wrote about what I call “#identity confusion“ (I should tag this more consistently) from the perspective of a Jew visiting Tasmania.
As a non-American, I see this kind of discourse coming from the US all the time: White people are a melting pot, white people have no culture, why are you talking about different shades of Mayonnaise?
Next thing you know, they apply the same framework to European countries, as if Spain and Denmark are the same because both are “white”.
Even “white“ Americans fall into this trap when they embark on their Grand Tour, a three-week trip to “Europe“ at age 21.
To me, this view of culture and ethnicity is quintessential American-Tourist-ism.
No terrible race politics but American race politics.
The whole “white people have no culture” thing is really just a weapon, though. It’s a noise, not a critique.
We may see the emergence of phalanx formations at protests now.
Not good. The formation of armed melee groups is undermining the legitimacy of the state.
I agree with my mind, but my heart trilled at the idea of protesters rediscovering basic military tactics.
Soon, Antifa discovered the technology of the piss-bottle spear.
I had the same thought, and then extrapolated all the way.
They’re not discovering basic tactics.
They’re discovering what tactics the police will let them get away with.
Because otherwise, they’d just put fireteams in hidden positions and have the whole thing over and done with.
You are correct. My contention is that the police need to step in as the arrival of shield formations is a sign that they aren’t adequately doing their jobs and is eroding confidence in the state’s ability to maintain order.
there should be a rule where you can’t get Australian citizenship if you’re born here, keep things fresh
Australian politicians caught having a dual citizenship must commit a crime against the UK
what like drinking decent beer
I support this policy because it would potentially lead to a hilarious international prank war. Vandalism or disturbing the peace would do.
Why on Earth would Tumblr recommend me a blog that has me blocked?
Yes, Voxette-san is part of the ratsphere, but if “You cannot reblog this post” is any indication, she’ll never be on board with Victory for National Technocracy.
(And if it isn’t a block, then it’s recommending me a blog it’s glitched me out of reblogging. Very hypocritical, Tumblr!)
Let me be clear: this was an arbitrary decision. It was different than what I’d talked talked with our senior team about yesterday. I woke up this morning in a bad mood and decided to kick them off the Internet. I called our legal team and told them what we were going to do. I called our Trust & Safety team and had them stop the service. It was a decision I could make because I’m the CEO of a major Internet infrastructure company.
Having made that decision we now need to talk about why it is so dangerous. I’ll be posting something on our blog later today. Literally, I woke up in a bad mood and decided someone shouldn’t be allowed on the Internet. No one should have that power.
fascinating
Wow this is a breath of fresh air
This guy has managed to combine “we need to think ASAP about the kind of precedent we’re setting with decisions like this” and “but for the moment, let’s fuck over Nazis,” two sentiments that are seem like no-brainers but which you somehow don’t expect anyone with Newsworthy Opinions to be able to hold in their mind simultaneously without exploding
“The Daily Stormer site was bragging on their bulletin boards about how Cloudflare was one of them and that is the opposite of everything we believe. That was the tipping point for me.”
That actually seems like a reasonable boundary there. Claiming endorsement is not quite the same thing as just being hosted.
What neither side of US politics wants to admit: the promotion of identity politics combined with the declining white super majority has led to turbo charged white identity politics. Since Dems catered for non-white identity politics, Trump and the GOP took hold of white identity politics.
Most countries that do not have a 70%+ super majority ethnic group have ethnicized electoral politics.
Yes, my fear is that Lee Kuan Yew is right.
saw a white woman wearing a black lives matter t-shirt the other day, with a nearby Indian family throwing suspicious glances at her; it felt incongruous
They were probably scanning her WokeScore™.
Mine is, uh, negative. Like really, really negative.
Anyhow, it’s considered a bit of a faux pas for a white woman to wear a shirt like that unless her WS is over 500. (The formal definition is 506.)
Of course, if you don’t load the WS app on your phone so it can’t monitor your behavior, you only get what others observe, which makes it a lot harder to buff with like, anti-racist meditation and stuff. Doubly so if you publicly associate with people with low WSs, show up to flag rallies, etc.
tbh after a while I started to lower mine on purpose.
Now we’re bordering on NationStates.net territory, my dear Anon.
I, for one, back the Techno-Principality of Greater Rock Springs.
Their combination of Neoreactionary, Demi-Confucian, Muskian, and PAP principles, fused with a synthetic Sino-Japano-Anime-American metaculture and corporate backing practically assures their success against the bio-primitivists and the Communist Block.
What I really want to know is who @xhxhxhx is betting on.
Who are you betting on? Answer in the comments below.
We may see the emergence of phalanx formations at protests now.
Not good. The formation of armed melee groups is undermining the legitimacy of the state.
I agree with my mind, but my heart trilled at the idea of protesters rediscovering basic military tactics.
Soon, Antifa discovered the technology of the piss-bottle spear.
For the record, I’m fine with cutting off a chunk of land for the Black Nationalists, too. I expect it to go about as well as the White Nationalist land, but again, so long as no one goes there involuntarily, it isn’t my problem.
I notice this one isn’t tagged “satire”, which seems to mean you actually think segregation is a valid solution. Never death though, that’s barbaric.
Keeping people that hate each others’ guts physically apart from each other is in fact superior to killing them, since they might eventually chill out but killing is permanent. Additionally, if it turns out someone has been separated that should not have been, they can be moved again later, whereas no one can be unexecuted. It isn’t that I think killing is never justified, but you lot huffing a hero fantasy about “killing Nazis” are too eager to kill and too detached to actually notice when you’re attacking dudes who are not Nazis.
It’s already well-known that at least one dude who was never at and was in no way attached to the march or white nationalists got doxxed as a “Nazi”.
I encourage being ABSOLUTELY certain before killing. I admire the “choose the reversible option first” philosophy, but segregation is not right. I’d think you’d have learned that from history.
What exactly do you think prisons are, if not segregating people who have a proven track record of violent or damaging behavior from the rest of the population?
Are you a prison abolitionist by means of death penalty?
And why can’t people live in different places with different rules? I actually support the creation of more city-states as a means of political preference satisfaction in general.
Also, let’s be honest here, Antifa sucks at figuring out who is and is not a Nazi and will indeed claim they are “absolutely certain” in the middle of killing people who are not and have never been Nazis.
At some point, you have to ask, is what you want to prevent people dying, or is what you want to punish those with what you deem to be evil beliefs? Because “put all the Nazis on their own little island” accomplishes the former, but not the latter.
Prisons are bad, but replacing them wholesale with the death penalty is only worse, way too many people arrested unjustly or for stupid things that shouldn’t be illegal.
Yes, antifa is generally bad at identifying actual opponents. You’ll notice I don’t tend to blanket state I support them, for that reason mainly.
I don’t know where you intend to set aside for all the different racists though. The places they want are already taken.
I don’t need to move all the racists, just the most racist of the racists. The most racist of the racists are among the most dangerous.
There are still a number of very lightly-developed areas in the world. They had to truck people in from all over the country just to make that rally. There isn’t going to be something where we need enough land for 100 million people. I don’t think Whitopia would get even one million people.
Singapore is about 720km2 in size. America is something like 9 million km2 in size. So Whitopia and Blaktopia each get about one one thousandth of a percent of the land, each with a 10km corridor for sea access. Doesn’t need to be great sea access either, just enough for a seaport.
(Also a wall would be built around each so that access could be controlled to prevent weird cross-border crime stuff.)
For the record, I’m fine with cutting off a chunk of land for the Black Nationalists, too. I expect it to go about as well as the White Nationalist land, but again, so long as no one goes there involuntarily, it isn’t my problem.
I notice this one isn’t tagged “satire”, which seems to mean you actually think segregation is a valid solution. Never death though, that’s barbaric.
Keeping people that hate each others’ guts physically apart from each other is in fact superior to killing them, since they might eventually chill out but killing is permanent. Additionally, if it turns out someone has been separated that should not have been, they can be moved again later, whereas no one can be unexecuted. It isn’t that I think killing is never justified, but you lot huffing a hero fantasy about “killing Nazis” are too eager to kill and too detached to actually notice when you’re attacking dudes who are not Nazis.
It’s already well-known that at least one dude who was never at and was in no way attached to the march or white nationalists got doxxed as a “Nazi”.
I encourage being ABSOLUTELY certain before killing. I admire the “choose the reversible option first” philosophy, but segregation is not right. I’d think you’d have learned that from history.
What exactly do you think prisons are, if not segregating people who have a proven track record of violent or damaging behavior from the rest of the population?
Are you a prison abolitionist by means of death penalty?
And why can’t people live in different places with different rules? I actually support the creation of more city-states as a means of political preference satisfaction in general.
Also, let’s be honest here, Antifa sucks at figuring out who is and is not a Nazi and will indeed claim they are “absolutely certain” in the middle of killing people who are not and have never been Nazis.
At some point, you have to ask, is what you want to prevent people dying, or is what you want to punish those with what you deem to be evil beliefs? Because “put all the Nazis on their own little island” could accomplish the former, but not the latter.
It’s a good question.
In terms of breaking the whole US up into little theme park ethnostates it’s definitely worthy of greater consideration.
However, in the context of what likely brought this to your mind just now, the tiny white nationalist theme park ethnostate (and corresponding black nationalist theme park ethnostate) would be small enough that they’d be effectively protected from invasion by being right next to the United States, and would benefit from access to American markets and infrastructure, so it doesn’t need much realpolitik maneuvering.
For my purposes, the tiny WN ethnostate exists for three purposes:
I don’t actually want to live in the Principality of Whitopia. (In fact, I haven’t disclosed on this blog whether I would even be eligible.)
The America I grew up in, and the America I believe in, is multiracial.
However, I also support the creation of more city-states as political experiments in general, even for philosophies that I think will fail.
For the record, I’m fine with cutting off a chunk of land for the Black Nationalists, too. I expect it to go about as well as the White Nationalist land, but again, so long as no one goes there involuntarily, it isn’t my problem.
I notice this one isn’t tagged “satire”, which seems to mean you actually think segregation is a valid solution. Never death though, that’s barbaric.
Keeping people that hate each others’ guts physically apart from each other is in fact superior to killing them, since they might eventually chill out but killing is permanent. Additionally, if it turns out someone has been separated that should not have been, they can be moved again later, whereas no one can be unexecuted. It isn’t that I think killing is never justified, but you lot huffing a hero fantasy about “killing Nazis” are too eager to kill and too detached to actually notice when you’re attacking dudes who are not Nazis.
It’s already well-known that at least one dude who was never at and was in no way attached to the march or white nationalists got doxxed as a “Nazi”.
if you post someone’s address, job, full name, personal details, anything that’s doxing, there are only two things that you want people to do to them:
1) really mess with them to an insane extent, like ordering gay porn, perfume samples, religious books and hundreds of pizzas sent to their house and try to ruin their personal lives/get them fire
2) kill them
so don’t fucking do it
don’t dox people
i want Nazi’s to get fired or worse
i get this but there has already been one instances from last week were people got the wrong person and it could fuck up his whole life for something they didn’t do
two instances, actually.
they got one of the wrong guys twice.
do you get that?
two people that are categorically NOT nazis got accused of being nazis by some half cocked dipshit on social media.
also fucking with nazis or trying to get them fired is categorically A Bad Idea.
I keep seeing this sentiment in the notes but don’t fucking do it
don’t feed into their victim narrative.
that’ll just push them further into extremism.
like, do you really think someone racist is gonna change their fuckin mind if they get fired because 5000 “undesirables” according to nazi doctrine get them fired?
do you think they’re suddenly magically gonna get a good attitude towards minorities that nazis have historically persecuted?
getting someone fired from a fucking hotdog job where they’re clearly miserable, probably not making much money in the first place ain’t gonna help.
not bein able to pay their bills will not teach them some sort of lesson, or the kind of lesson that would lead to them not being a fuckhead.
it’ll teach them
“these subhumans want you starving, want you to be unable to feed your families and want you dead”
WELL DONE
YOU JUST RADICALIZED A DUMBFUCK EVEN FURTHER
HE’S GOING TO GO DEEPER INTO EXTREMISM THANKS TO YOU, IDIOT
DON’T DOX PEOPLE
This is a major problem we as a society have with deradicalization. Like, you can’t exile someone from society and expect them to reform, it just further radicalizes them. People are social animals and need a network of healthy relationships so as to deradicalize. If you cut people off from the opportunity to build those relationships, you’re ensuring that the problem will never ever get fixed
An excellent treatise on why prison doesn’t work. The nazis already are nazis with a network of relationships, likely with other nazis if they were in a gathering with other nazis. Are you suggesting the targets of nazis shoukld sit down and talk with people who literally want them dead. or else to literally do nothing?
Well I mean it worked for me, so yeah, pretty much.
congratulations on not being a nazi anymore, not everyone is so quick to give it up.
Yeah, and your methods are only making the problem worse, so I’d appreciate it if you got out of the way.
You don’t know my methods, or do you think dead nazis are more of a problem than alive ones?
You are absolutely right, friend. The government must act to stop this epidemic of ideologically extreme vehicular homicide through every means possible. Driving into crowds is never forgivable.
Therefore every Jihadi and Jihadi sympathizer must be executed. No safe spaces for Jihadis. Their sick and twisted ideology offers no deconversion. The only good Jihadi is a dead Jihadi.
Liberals might protest that Jihadis don’t cause much violence, statistically, but the only voice Jihadis will listen to is violence.
For the record, I’m fine with cutting off a chunk of land for the Black Nationalists, too. I expect it to go about as well as the White Nationalist land, but again, so long as no one goes there involuntarily, it isn’t my problem.
We may see the emergence of phalanx formations at protests now.
Not good. The formation of armed melee groups is undermining the legitimacy of the state.
Don’t fall down the rabbithole, anon. You deserve better than that.
An artificial neural network might give you a more realistic feeling ‘waifu’ or even a digital harem, but once you remove all the supportive scaffolding - the game engine, the art assets, voice synthesis base lines, dialog templates, and so on - what’s left is three to five orders of magnitude less complex than a real woman.
That’s a pet, not a person.
It isn’t a proper replacement for real human companionship, for human love, for human loyalty.
Now, I’m not saying it’s wrong. I have an AI companion embed myself that I use to delegate tasks, including reading through and summarizing the day’s Argumate posts. And, of course, many households have various robots - including mine, when I was with my ex!
But it isn’t a real substitute. It’s a very unhealthy path to go down, and some people, they become addicted, and it really kills them inside. So don’t do that to yourself, okay?
Trump is handling this poorly, even by his own standards. He could have disavowed of them loudly, and ended his speech with something like “And that’s why we are going to build a nice, big, non-violent wall“
He could even have signed an executive order to establish a General Lee museum where they collect all the statues. That would still have been better than this.
Why did he not just do a Nixon-style dog whistle or something? I bet somebody wrote him a speech to that extent and he winged it!
He isn’t wrong about the potential for value drift - many Leftists already dislike or hate the U.S. founding fathers.
However, I endorse creating a Museum of the Confederacy and putting them all there. In fact, I really like that idea. There have got to be like three dozen or more of the things, so they could be put outside/etc. You might get rid of some of the most similar-looking ones.
I live in Russia. I can casually buy a belt buckle with the confederate flag at the flea market. how
Use of the Confederate flag on clothing and stuff was pretty much unquestioned until very recently, that’s not a value judgment that’s just a statement of fact. Also says there should bad, you should be able to buy the Buckle with anything on it.
no, i mean
obv it’s not illegal
but how is this a thing that has market value here of all things
Putin’s long-term plan to divide the United States by having the South rise again. He sponsored this recent rally as part of a long-term goal of reviving the Confederate States of America and pitting it, once again, against the virtuous northern Union.
(Of course I say this jokingly. He’s actually funding California separatists.)
that adhd feel when you can’t even focus on the things you love doing + that are important to you, and you start to question whether you actually care about those things at all and feel like you have no interests or hobbies
Liberal Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Request For Bread
Conservative Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The You Think You Deserve Bread You Lazy Entitled Fucking Millennial Well Guess What No One Owes You Anything
Libertarian Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Sustainable Production of Bread While Communists Starve In Bread Lines and Conservatives Pay Farmers More Money Not To Farm
Technolibertarian Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Disruption of the Incumbent Bread Industry In the Hands Of My Friend’s Startup
Socdem Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Means-Tested Subsidization Of Bread So Poor People Can Afford To Buy It Even With the Taxation of Bread
Primitivist Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Abolition of Bread as an Artefact of Evil Agricultural-Technological Civilization
Agorist Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Methods People Resort To to Find Bread Now That the Government’s Price Controls Have Made It Impossible To Find In The Stores Wink Wink
Populist Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Deportation Of The Immigrants Who Used To Make Bread and The Discovery That The Natives Didn’t Really Want Those Jobs After All So Now Bread Is Really Expensive But It’s Okay We’ll Just Blame The Jews For It
Liberaltarian Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Cost Of Giving Everyone Enough Money To Buy Bread Or Something Else If They Would Prefer It Over Bread
Corporatist Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Purpose Of Bread Is To Enrichen Political Favorites Not Satisfy Market Demand
Anarcho-capitalist Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Calculations On How Much To Pay Whom For What To Ensure That It’s In Everyone’s Interests To Produce Bread That’s Safe To Eat Look Guys If My Numbers Hold It Would Be Totally Possible To Do It Without a Central Regulatory Authority
Anarcho-transhumanist Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, I Invented A Bread Fabricator That Can Produce Edible Bread Out Of Any Organic Material And Open-Sourced It So Anyone Can Obtain One So Could We Please Get Over This Discussion Now
Moldbuggian NRx Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, Having a King Would Make Our Bread Better Somehow
Landian NRx Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, Bread Is Not An Omohundro Goal So Once The Indifferent Techno-God Arrives There Will Be No More Bread For Anybody
Singularitarian Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Simulation Of Bread
Bioconservative Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Necessity of Banning That Bread Fabricator Because Starvation Is a Crucial Component Of Human Existence
Technocorporatist Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Regulation of Bread Fabricator Technology So That Only Huge Corporations Can Have Them And Everyone Else Needs To Become Our Serfs
Woke Peter Kropotkin’s seminal work, The Fabrication of Bread Is Cultural Genocide Because Not Starving Is White Cultural Imperialism And That’s Why The Government Needs To Protect Non-Whites From Access To Bread Fabricators To Preserve Their Subsistence-Agricultural Societies
Alt-right Kropotkin’s seminal work, Breadcucks BTFO, Kek
It’s a real pity the thesis is so insane, because a lot of the supporting arguments are both accurate and quotable.
What a fascinating take.
Handful of ancaps following this blog despite the plan to transform America into a bigger and more heavily-armed Singapore - or because of the plan to transform America into a bigger and more heavily-armed Singapore?
I mean taking a page from the enemy’s playbook is a smart move, but yeah, there’s always a hidden cost to it