personally-offended-by-coats liked this

elunicornus reblogged this from women-in-poweer

idktakenname liked this

reiccier liked this

tildacoon reblogged this from alexandrites

thecharredforest reblogged this from lord-kitschener

mylittlebigobsessions reblogged this from hannibals-cheekbones

aoizure reblogged this from hannibals-cheekbones

fuck-off-fuck-boys liked this

hannibals-cheekbones reblogged this from antaresferen

alexandrites reblogged this from feminismandhappiness

alexandrites liked this

antaresferen reblogged this from gender-studies

pizza838383 reblogged this from bentliencnc

themanfromnantucket liked this

tonomato39 said: than men controlling for variables like education, experience, age, seniority at a company, geographical location, occupation, race, sexual orientation, ability. And women are expected to do housekeeping tasks at work, too, that are not part of their job description, and that hold them back from promotion (while men are rarely asked to do these tasks, and if they do do them, are praised, but when women do those tasks, they are unacknowledged for their work).

tonomato39 said: No. Women have to work fewer hours because our society saddles them with the bulk of the housework & caregiving responsibilities, a.k.a. the “second shift.” Women work two full-time jobs to men’s one full-time job: that’s why we get so good at multi-tasking. Men may be logging longer hours at work, but that doesn’t mean those extra hours are productive; women have to get everything done at work before they go home to take care of everyone else. Women are still paid less