1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
cromulentenough
cromulentenough:
“ mitigatedchaos:
“ slartibartfastibast:
“ mitigatedchaos:
“ elementarynationalism:
“ JUST GAVE MY KIDS SQUIFFY EYES, A DOUBLE DIGIT IQ AND A CLEFT LIP. #sorrynotsorry ”
I FUCKING CALLED IT! THEY’D RATHER NORMALIZE COUSIN MARRIAGE...
elementarynationalism

JUST GAVE MY KIDS SQUIFFY EYES, A DOUBLE DIGIT IQ AND A CLEFT LIP.

#sorrynotsorry

mitigatedchaos

I FUCKING CALLED IT! THEY’D RATHER NORMALIZE COUSIN MARRIAGE THAN BE ACCUSED OF “RACISM”

slartibartfastibast

Dude, if they don’t mind normalizing rotherham-style child trafficking, they definitely won’t mind a manyfold increase in birth defects.

mitigatedchaos

Not less than three months ago, US dem party members themselves told me this would not happen.

Now I must continue my experiment by hunting down the original tweet and seeing if they decide that wanting to prevent cousin marriage was racist all along.

cromulentenough

@rapid-apathy

It’s not part of islam in the sense that islam says you SHOULD do it, but it’s part of it in the sesne that islam says you’re ALLOWED to do it.

The rule is there’s a list of people you CAN’T marry, and anyone not in the list you’re allowed to marry, and the list doesn’t include first cousins in it.

marrying first cousins isn’t islamically preferred or anything like that.

mitigatedchaos

Which means it might be possible to stamp out if the Left don’t backstab the rest of us on it.  

Cousin marriage is the bad for integration, bad for women, bad for children, and bad for the health service.

Also, update: It seems that the program is real.  Let me know if any of y’all have watched it.

Source: elementarynationalism politics
wirehead-wannabe
argumate

I mean if nothing else, the majority of misogynist men appear to be in sexual relationships with women at various points in their lives, and are hence “getting some” without fundamentally shifting their opinions.

ms-demeanor

The “dude hates women because he can’t get laid” thing irritates me from a number of directions.

Dudes who get lots of sex from women frequently hate women, dudes who want sex with women but are “volcel” or not interested in “sluts riding the cock carousel” or whatever manosphere redpill grossness is floating around have some weird shit going on and probably need hugs and sympathy for other reasons but that doesn’t excuse the fact that lots of them just hate women.

But that’s just some of the straight dudes.

I’ve known a lot of *deeply* misogynistic/femmephobic/transphobic gay men and at least a couple of very misogynist ace folks. I know a *TREMENDOUS* number of misogynist straight women, who are sexist as fuck and fighting daily battles with their own internalized misogyny but who are certainly not motivated in their contempt and hatred for women by a desire to fuck them. Misogyny in gay men, straight women, and ace folks at least proves that misogyny can be completely divorced from an unfulfilled desire for vaginal sex.

I think the reason we hear the “he’s just mad because he’s not getting any” is because there is a not-insignificant number of men who will be more vocal about their misogyny when they’re single and having trouble “pulling” - that’s where you get stories from women in bars who get called stuck-up bitches or who are told all women are the same gold-digging whores and whatever, because some dude tried to hit on them and got shut down. I heard an awful lot of this kind of thing as a comforting shoulder to many a geek who wanted to know what was wrong with him and why girls didn’t like him and went for the jock or the dude with the motorcycle or the asshole with the tattoos. But I also ran LGBT clubs and was the shoulder for a lot of gay men discussing how disgusting vaginas are and how they don’t even want women around (and I understand that a lot of that probably is a defense mechanism for young men being pressured into performing heteronormativity who are totally uninterested in women and ambivalence can easily become revulsion when you’re pressured into doing things you don’t want to that aren’t right for you; I feel less sympathy and understanding for older gay men I know now who continue to regularly discuss how icky vaginas are and how women are cock-hungry because they’ve got penis envy and aren’t whole without a dick in them somewhere, what the fuck you sound like radfems)

I’m rambling too much, but here’s what I’m trying to get down to: many women hear the most vocal, vicious, misogynist things from men they’ve just turned down or from men whose catcalls they’ve ignored. I think the reason a lot of women default to “you just can’t get laid” as an insult to misogynists is because their mental picture of “misogynist” is “that guy who chased me for two blocks because I wouldn’t smile” or “that guy who screamed at me in the bar” or “that guy who called me a bitch in science class because I didn’t accept his promposal” or “that asshole who said I put him in the friendzone when I wouldn’t sleep with him after a breakup because I just thought he was my friend.”

I’m not saying that it’s right or it’s good that people default to “wants and can’t attain straight sex” as the handwave for misogyny, I’m saying we should figure out where this is coming from. Homophobia and compulsory heterosexuality are probably a significant part of the answer, but lived experience of women being personally attacked (either verbally or physically) by men whom they’ve rejected is probably another part.

And, yeah, a lot of this ends up throwing LGBTQIA folks under the bus - an adult who menstruates and is freaked out by tampons is assumed to be childish or a prude instead of sex-repulsed or penetration-averse or experiencing dysphoria; an adult who doesn’t seek (primarily straight) sex is assumed to be broken.

And that’s all fucked up.

So yeah, feminist folks, you are perpetuating the cycle of toxic masculinity when you use “this loser can’t get laid” as an insult (also when you use “prude” as an insult - there are lots of good reasons people aren’t interested in sex or aren’t interested in hearing about sex in lots of contexts, oversharing when someone is uncomfortable with it is violating their consent).

And I’ll just end my rant with “can we just try not to be jerks to each other? That’d be swell.”

mitigatedchaos

So you have that, but also there is a conflation of “what straight women want or find attractive” with “good” which this is a part of.

Source: argumate gender politics
slartibartfastibast
slartibartfastibast:
“ mitigatedchaos:
“ elementarynationalism:
“ JUST GAVE MY KIDS SQUIFFY EYES, A DOUBLE DIGIT IQ AND A CLEFT LIP. #sorrynotsorry ”
I FUCKING CALLED IT! THEY’D RATHER NORMALIZE COUSIN MARRIAGE THAN BE ACCUSED OF “RACISM” ”
Dude, if...
elementarynationalism

JUST GAVE MY KIDS SQUIFFY EYES, A DOUBLE DIGIT IQ AND A CLEFT LIP.

#sorrynotsorry

mitigatedchaos

I FUCKING CALLED IT! THEY’D RATHER NORMALIZE COUSIN MARRIAGE THAN BE ACCUSED OF “RACISM”

slartibartfastibast

Dude, if they don’t mind normalizing rotherham-style child trafficking, they definitely won’t mind a manyfold increase in birth defects.

mitigatedchaos

Not less than three months ago, US dem party members themselves told me this would not happen.

Now I must continue my experiment by hunting down the original tweet and seeing if they decide that wanting to prevent cousin marriage was racist all along.

Source: elementarynationalism politics
theunitofcaring

Anonymous asked:

Ok, but I don't only want people to have enough money to live on (though I very much want that!). I also want business to *stop exploiting people*. And I haven't been seeing people propose alternative means for doing that?

theunitofcaring answered:

If people had enough money to live on regardless of whether they took a job, then businesses would have to offer conditions good enough people wanted to work even though they didn’t have to work to survive. Giving people enough money to live on is also the best way to make sure they don’t work under exploitative conditions. 

mitigatedchaos

Lowering the wages that can be profitably offered without starving people to death also increases the number of potential jobs to choose from.

mutant-aesthetic
mutant-aesthetic

@lets-talk-about-politics replied to your link: Politico: I Found HanAssholeSolo’s anti-Semitic…

So this backlash, the death threats, the intimidation, the violence, all of that is justified?   

The backlash in terms of people rightfully decrying CNN and raising cain, I think that’s a very good thing. Obviously the more extreme response I don’t condone, much in the same way I don’t condone a bear eating the drunk moron who tries to wrestle it. But much like trying to wrestle a bear while shitfaced, trying to police public discourse in the age of the internet has consequences, and reporters are not magically immune to the consequences of their extremely poor decisions.

We teach people that freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences. We seem to forget, however, that the same thing applies to freedom of the press.

politics
collapsedsquid
collapsedsquid

You know what that means.  It’s time to homestead!

Or wait, can I homestead, or does this new land belong to the owners of the mountains it fell from?  Dammit, this homesteading stuff is so confusing.

mitigatedchaos

“That isn’t how dirt works,” the Statist said.  “’Land’ is just a useful abstraction for the unsubmerged surface of a volume of minerals on a planet.”

“This here is my land!”  The man objected, as the cliff crumpled behind them, sliding into the sea.

politics