1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
osberend
osberend:
“ gibsterlife:
“Ok but this is actually the most succinct argument on why the friend zone is bad I’ve ever seen
”
Succinct and wrong.
Men (and women! who do exist!) who complain about being stuck in the friend zone aren’t lamenting that...
gibsterlife

Ok but this is actually the most succinct argument on why the friend zone is bad I’ve ever seen

osberend

Succinct and wrong.

Men (and women! who do exist!) who complain about being stuck in the friend zone aren’t lamenting that it’s shitty to have friends who are the gender they’re attracted to but who aren’t romantic or sexual partners; they’re lamenting that it’s shitty to *not have any romantic and)or sexual partners*, even if they have friends (of the gender they’re attracted to or otherwise).

And some people who engage in such lamentation have shitty views about the psychology of the opposite sex. Some have views that aren’t particularly shitty, but are simply *factually wrong*. And some don’t.

(The tendency of some people, mainly women, to explain their lack of romantic interest in very “ladder theory”–like terms in a misguided attempt to “let ‘em down easy” is pretty clearly the fundamental cause of many of the incorrect ideas here, although at this point a number of them have taken on a life of their own, sometimes in strange, mutant forms. In fact, I’d argue that ladder theory is nothing more than what you get when a bunch of straight men take multiple straight women’s “white lies” at face value, and then (over)generalize the resulting conclusions from “many women, including all the ones I’ve gotten up the courage to ask out, are like this” to “all women are like this.” But that’s a distinctly secondary point.)

I would rather (continue to) have any of my female friends as friends than not have them as any of friends, sexual partners , or girlfriends. If this weren’t the case, I wouldn’t be friends with them in the first place.

But out of those of them who aren’t close relatives, underage, or taken, I would still prefer to have *any* of them as friends + (happy) girlfriends and/or sex partners (ideally both) than as friends alone, absent specific and compelling reasons not to. I’m frankly kind of confused as to why anyone (who is sexually attracted to women) wouldn’t.

That doesn’t imply that I don’t value their friendship, absent anything more! It doesn’t even suggest it!

And yes, it is frustrating that some of these women like me as a friend, are single, *and* are attracted to men, and yet don’t want to at least give dating and/or having sex with me a shot to see how they (and I) like it. If I imagine their brains as working similarly to mine as regards romantic and sexual desire, then it seems like they logically should. But in fact, they don’t. And that is what being in the friend zone means, fundamentally, and it does, in fact, suck. It sucks *less* than having neither (platonic) female friends nor a girlfriend — precisely because I *do* value their friendship, even if it will never lead to anything more — but it still sucks.

And the more you try to argue that it doesn’t, and that only some caricature of am entitled misogynist would think that it does, the more you’re going to (1) hurt decent people who don’t in any way deserve that and (2) drive the people you’re hurting into the arms of your anyone that’s willing to risk bring called the full litany of feminist insults to take a stand against you.

If you’re *lucky*, that will be someone like me, or @slatestarscratchpad, or @theunitofcaring, or @funereal-disease. Someone, in short, who recognizes the cyanide in your Kool-Aid for what it is, and who believes in egalitarianism and basic human decency.

But if you’re not, it will be redpillers, or worse.

And yeah, a guy who *lets* himself be driven into the arms of redpillers is morally responsible for that. But you sure as hell bear some responsibility too.

Source: millennial-review gender politics
funereal-disease
marmod

having a 3yo brother means i get exposed to kids’ shows way more often than i thought i would at this point in my life, but man, binge watching thomas the tank engine as an adult is a wild fucking experience

all these trains (and there’s like 20 counting locomotives alone, don’t even get me started on the anthropomorphic train cabins) are MAD competitive the whole time and will constantly fuck up their own whole day by tring to prove they’re the biggest baddest train. and like, i understand that you gotta get you plot from somewhere and i imagine plotlines like this happen in cars etc. as well, but the other day i was watching and i noticed that all these goddamn locomotives have DRIVERS in them. that apparently have no control over their train’s actions at all whatsoever. so these trains wake up, pick up their drivers, go to work, get taunted by another train who’s like “ha ha i see u there with your 4 cabins but did you know i can pull SIX cabins and still fucking book it at 80mph” and the 4 cabin train will be like “fuck it i gotta prove myself now, hook me up with 4 more cabins” and will inevitably derail themselves or some shit while the engine driver just shuts up and kicks back the whole time

i explained this to my brother and was like, is that fucked up or what, but he just pointed at the green train and went “that’s percy” so i guess that’s his take on the situation

Source: hemaris
the-grey-tribe
aellagirl

I want to complain about people who send messages containing only ‘hi’ or something similar. This happens mostly on dating sites, but it happens on Tumblr too. 

Like, what do you think will happen? Do you think I will also say ‘hi’ back and then you will be like ‘how are you’ and I will be like ‘pretty good how about you’ and you will be like ‘i like your stuff’ and I will be like ‘your blog is pretty cool too’ and then you will be like ‘yeah lol’ and i will be like ‘do you wanna have sex’?

polyaletheia

It’s annoying, but it’s better than those people who don’t send messages at all, and just expect to receive them.

earnest-peer

Disagree unless they can actually make that expectation relevant to you.

There was a hilarious dating site a while ago (whose name I forgot and which might well still exist) where the concept was that only women could initiate conversation. The consequence was that women would send hot men empty messages so they could initiate.

mitigatedchaos

Apparently reality is more exaggerated than even my own beliefs.

Source: aellagirl gender politics
argumate
argumate

got an iron pan, see if it can free me from the tyranny of teflon.

modern consumerism prefers the smarts to be baked into the product, so instead of learning new skills or gaining experience (personal growth!) you just upgrade your life by purchasing a better model.

so far this process still fails to work for some product categories: no matter how good the knife you have to know how to sharpen it, and no matter how good the pan you have to know how to season it, or be consigned to a succession of disposable items, which is the flip side of purchasing upgrades: binning the old stuff.

argumate

to clarify I am absolutely terrible at these things; frankly if you could purchase competence online with one-click checkout I would be incredibly pleased

mitigatedchaos

DO NOT EVER PIRATE SKILL SOFTWARE

ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS 

Yes, good man, always make sure you purchase skill software legitimately, and cryptographically signed directly from the vendor.  Further, the deeper your implants and the deeper you run the software, the more important it is that it isn’t compromise.  People like to think of it as just a tool, but when you run skills, it becomes part of you.

I know people call me paranoid, but I only ever run skill software in standalone mode.  It’s good security practice to only interface with networks externally, too, and neuro-gap components.  Your mind is a fortress and it’s best not to leave holes in the walls.

augmented reality break discourse preview 2078
rtrixie
thivus

free markets werent such a bad idea at first but i think theyve run their course

the idea that a corporation make the end user pay for a product but then place in their terms of agreement that said corporation is the real owner is actually evil

the end user should be the absolute sovereign owner

also closed source is bad and gross open source is good

terran-tophat

What are you rambling on about now, you flaming homosexual?

azureleon

A rant about physical products are now licensed rather than outright bought.

Something akin to the original intention of Xbox one during unveiling

rtrixie

stocking Stallman is right

mitigatedchaos

There’s a reason commercial software is so successful when FOSS is just sitting right there in competition.

You want what you need, not the minimum of what some bored sysadmin in Oklahoma can code in his spare time.  Having to actually sell the stuff provides funds to hire developers and keeps the project from going too off-the-rails.

That doesn’t mean there aren’t alternative ways to arrange software development, just that “boo, closed source!” isn’t very clueful on the intersection of economics and software development.

Source: thivus
slartibartfastibast
mitigatedchaos

@slartibartfastibast

I don’t think we’ll see Neural Nets creating entire television shows any time soon, in addition to other classes of drawings/images, for two reasons.

1) During the act of creation, human beings are able to constantly evaluate what looks good according to their own tastes, thus acting in a both backwards and forwards search through the content space.  A regular neural network which is orders of magnitude less complex cannot accomplish this or logically reason about it.

2) Filling in certain elements requires higher abstract reasoning, which is more complex and also requires a lot more power.  (e.g., logically deducing facts about things which are not immediately visible in the scene)

What I think we’ll see instead are patches, filters, and tools.  Not “make me a South Park episode”, but “make me a texture of gravel”.  An existing one sharpens up pictures of animu girlz, and likely a NN could be trained to, for example, increase the resolution on old 90′s anime.

slartibartfastibast

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generative_adversarial_networks

(I do agree that low-level feature generation will be used first)

mitigatedchaos

Oh, it may well get there eventually, but with the slowdown on Moore’s Law, it depends on one’s evaluation of just how powerful and just how inefficient human brains are - and if they’re doing stuff with microtubules and non-trivial quantum stuff, that suggests something more rather than less powerful than previous estimates.  

It’s likely that, aside from the requirements for replication (itself non-trivial), the human brain’s computational density isn’t that horrifically poorly tuned, probably reflecting tradeoffs in energy consumption, heat dissipation, latency, durability, and so on.

Currently, I’m forecasting specialized modules on dedicated hardware, but I don’t think we’re going to hit the levels of computational cost/density that Kurzweil and the other Singulatarians predicted, as the cost in engineer manhours per chip is going up, last I checked.

(I think I’ve already mentioned some implications for ethics.)

It does cause the information risks you’re worried about long before being able to create an entire South Park episode, however.

Source: mitigatedchaos mitigated future

@slartibartfastibast

I don’t think we’ll see Neural Nets creating entire television shows any time soon, in addition to other classes of drawings/images, for two reasons.

1) During the act of creation, human beings are able to constantly evaluate what looks good according to their own tastes, thus acting in a both backwards and forwards search through the content space.  A regular neural network which is orders of magnitude less complex cannot accomplish this or logically reason about it.

2) Filling in certain elements requires higher abstract reasoning, which is more complex and also requires a lot more power.  (e.g., logically deducing facts about things which are not immediately visible in the scene)

What I think we’ll see instead are patches, filters, and tools.  Not “make me a South Park episode”, but “make me a texture of gravel”.  An existing one sharpens up pictures of animu girlz, and likely a NN could be trained to, for example, increase the resolution on old 90′s anime.

mitigated future