1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
rtrixie
rtrixie:
“ catholic-blackshirt:
“ So rather than answering my legitimate question, @sam-keeper ‘s immediate response is an ad hominem attack and blocking me.
Liberals are weird sometimes.
Worse than blocking me and worse than the ad hominem attack,...
catholic-blackshirt

So rather than answering my legitimate question, @sam-keeper ‘s immediate response is an ad hominem attack and blocking me.
Liberals are weird sometimes.

Worse than blocking me and worse than the ad hominem attack, though, is that I still have no idea what “[our government is impenetrable except when women hack its shit]” is referring to.

rtrixie

Hwat

mitigatedchaos

Probably Reality Winner, but IIRC that was a leak, not a hack.

Source: catholic-blackshirt
mitigatedchaos
mitigatedchaos:
“ “Dude, how many layers of Weird Near-Future Sci-Fi Politics are you on right now?”
“I dunno, let me go consult the chart.” ”
“@kissingerandpals: what?
”
“Me: hey me, you know what would be hilarious?
* completely sober at 3 in the...
mitigatedchaos

“Dude, how many layers of Weird Near-Future Sci-Fi Politics are you on right now?”

“I dunno, let me go consult the chart.”

mitigatedchaos

@kissingerandpals: what?

Me: hey me, you know what would be hilarious?

* completely sober at 3 in the morning *

Also me: what fam?

Me: aight, so we like, do the expanding brain meme, but for national technocr- i mean uh expanding the search space of solutions to near-modern political problems, and the punchline is ~nuclear moon base~

Also me: hahahaha politics amirite?


The central thesis of this blog is that we won’t find the solutions to the challenges of the 21st century by re-fighting the battles of the 20th century.  We are doing current politics and it’s having the current results, but we all want something better, and that necessarily means something different.

The current political ideologies are mostly unaware of the future and the ways in which it will likely dramatically upend them.  Not only are they not prepared for its problems, but they aren’t prepared to take advantage of new potential solutions, either.  And without acknowledging those solutions, they often pretend that the problems don’t exist, for ideological reasons.

Some of the proposals on here some fake, but each could be a real policy with more detail.

politics
argumate
Average Argumate post kills 1.3 people” just statistical error. The average Argumate post kills only 0.0015 people. “no guys, it’s totally safe to come to Australia”, which kills over 3,000 Tumblr users each year in drop bear attacks alone, is an outlier and should not have been counted.

@mitigatedchaos

regular reminder that Australian wildlife is tame compared to America

(via argumate)

America was actually the Death Continent all along.  Woe betide any who dare think to master it!

diarrheaworldstarhiphop

maplebodybutter asked:

Radical Center: VERY serious about not taking sides, and trying to appeal to the widest audience.

diarrheaworldstarhiphop answered:

Radical center**


**See: american corporate perspective

mitigatedchaos

Does something which would be a significant departure from the status quo but not aligned on the conventional left/right axis also count, or is that Edgy Centrist?  

I’m going to have to make a chart to keep track of all the new kinds of Centrism lately.

politics
argumate

Anonymous asked:

you do realize PEOPLE are DYING while you're blogging about hoobastank?

argumate answered:

god I hope my post didn’t kill them

mitigatedchaos

“Average Argumate post kills 1.3 people” just statistical error. The average Argumate post kills only 0.0015 people. “no guys, it’s totally safe to come to Australia”, which kills over 3,000 Tumblr users each year in drop bear attacks alone, is an outlier and should not have been counted.

shtpost
mutant-aesthetic
mutant-aesthetic

I’m not a socialist or a communist, but I could probably defend socialism/communism in the wake of the Venezuelan failure much better than most lefties I see doing it are

All I simply have to do is explain that Hugo Chavez’s moronic spending decisions (generous spending on welfare/aid programs rather than infrastructure, education and industry so that the country wouldn’t be dependent on oil export money) showcased his failings as a leader and do not actually indicate a failure in central economic planning as a whole

Of course I don’t think they’ll do this because it would mean tarnishing Chavez’s legacy and his cult of personality

mitigatedchaos

How I would defend it: Actually, Kibbutzes are Good

politics