1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
argumate
argumate

fuckin’ millennials at it again

collapsedsquid

👋Redistribute👋avocados👋to👋millennials👋

argumate

the👋claps👋only👋go👋between👋the👋words👋mum

mitigatedchaos

“The ‘Emoji Death Front’, first known as the ‘Death to Emoji Working Group’ and then ‘Emoji Extinction Dot Net’, is a distributed terrorist group which first emerged in Sydney, Australia, in 2033, coming to prominence in an attack on the Pyongyang Olympics in 2036.  The stated aim of the group is the removal of emoji from Unicode, a goal for which it is willing to-”
- excerpt, Google Automatic Summary for “emoji death”, May 2, 2038

augmented reality break chronofelony shtpost mitigated fiction mitigated future not real
mitigatedchaos
mitigatedchaos

@argumate @collapsedsquid

The thing I like about the idea of mandatory safety insurance is that it introduces a new actor with new incentives into the problem.

Let us return to aircraft.

The State has determined that every airline company must carry two million dollars in insurance per passenger per flight, to be paid out in the event that the plane is destroyed and they die.  It has set certain rules, for instance that the insurance company must be sufficiently well-capitalized and it can’t just waive paying out because the company did something stupid.

Executive Todd has plans to reduce the maintenance on Tumblr Airlines aircraft.  He will be at the company for five years.  There is a 90% chance that if he does this, there will be no crash, and he gets a million dollar bonus and leaves.  There is a 10% chance that a plane will crash before he leaves and he’ll only have a personal fortune of ten million dollars and a mansion on Hawaii left, which he can retire to.

So Todd orders that the maintenance should be cut.

However, Blue Hellsite Insurance, Inc., Tumblr Airlines’ insurance company, depends for its funding entirely on carefully calculating risk and then charging a bit more than that, on an ongoing basis.  To do so, as part of their contract (and thanks to provisions passed in law by the State), they can set insurance agents out to inspect processes, planes, and so on.

BHI’s reaction to a plan that results in a 10% chance of a plane crash is “you WHAT?!”  Whereas the risk isn’t necessarily quite so visible or quantified to all others in the organization, or else they may have motivations to ignore it for the same reason as Executive Todd.

So BHI come back and say that either Todd’s plan isn’t going to fly, or the insurance rates are going to go up.

So what was an invisible cost that could have gotten kicked down the road to a successor is transmuted into a stubborn operating cost right now.

Tumblr Airlines makes less profit (upsetting shareholders), raises ticket prices to compensate (thus pricing the risk into the market and making them less competitive), or else doesn’t go through with the plan.

The State could even require that the portion of the cost which is the risk premium is printed on the ticket, informing consumers of roughly how dangerous a given flight is.  This is actually an enormous information gain by consumers, who as non-experts find it very difficult to not only judge airline safety, but obtain inside information about aircraft maintenance procedures.

mitigatedchaos

@e8u What about Todd the Insurance Executive?

An astute observation.  I actually left off that part in order to conserve length.

This entire scenario still depends on state intervention, which is why AnCaps and most Right Libertarians will not be in favor of it, even though it loosens the details of regulation to the markets and allows riskier behavior (but just prices it more).

Here’s what the State needs to do to cause this to happen:

  • Require mandatory insurance on certain classes of products.
  • Determine the rules governing the insurance so that the insurance will actually pay out.  
    • For instance, wrongdoing on the part of the airline does not get the insurance company out of paying the insurance.  (It could, however, allow them to pursue damages against the airline without breaking these necessary conditions.)
  • Ensure the insurance companies are sufficiently well-capitalized, so that it does not become common practice to make insurance shell companies which immediately fold rather than pay out.  Criminal liability may need to be introduced here.
  • Create a court system in which it is reasonably feasible for regular people to actually collect the insurance payout.  (It isn’t necessary that they collect the full payout, just enough that they’re willing to initiate and complete the necessary legal procedures.  Some money could go into an ethical offset fund instead.)

I would say that there have to actually be enough competing insurance companies, but the market will take care of that, since this should be a reasonably profitable field.  And the insurance company itself is a longer-term investment vehicle than the airline, since its practice of distributing risk changes when investors will get paid.

So, the question then is, is a system of competing insurance companies with competing insurance regulations more or less efficient and effective than a system of top-down, politically-driven regulation where government decides the details of regulations?

And that question is an empirical one.  In systems as complex as economies, we can’t just assume the efficient market hypothesis.  After all, this plan is in many ways in response to the existing market distortions of limited liability corporations and destruction of value being easier than creation of value.

Do it right, however, and you can also chip away at information asymmetry - the risk pricing by a moderately profitable insurance company that actually has to pay out if the product is dangerous or defective, as a share of the product’s price, communicates a lot of information that the customer previously often didn’t have.

the invisible fist the iron hand
collapsedsquid
collapsedsquid:
“ thevoluntaryist:
“New ultrasound technology captures image of child moments before birth.
”
Seein both socialists and libertarians reblog this amuses me, and there’s even some argument going on in the notes I can’t be arsed to track...
thevoluntaryist

New ultrasound technology captures image of child moments before birth.

collapsedsquid

Seein both socialists and libertarians reblog this amuses me, and there’s even some argument going on in the notes I can’t be arsed to track down.

mitigatedchaos

#property is a part of the social contract

Not if I define all property as an extension of the self by conflating the personhood-granting element (consciousness) with the entire rest of the system (subconscious over which conscious has little control) and draw the root of causality at the point of this amalgam, ignoring all causal inputs! Hah, gotcha, Commie!

(this might be a shtpost)

Source: thevoluntaryist its definitely a shtpost politics
greyliliy
greyliliy

Why would you ever like/want to read age gap where a grown adult is with a teenager!?

Maybe because it’s the only way to write about someone inexperienced with someone experienced without being mocked or told you’re writing “Born Sexy Yesterday” (and then being mocked and condemned for that particular offense).

I feel like the second you write anyone over 20 as sexually inexperienced, people either start laughing at how pathetic it is or start wondering what’s wrong with the character. The older the characters get, the more intense it gets

If you’re single at 30, most people assume it’s because you have a few failed relationships under your belt (or are widowed). Being 30 and inexperienced (or never have dated/married) is almost a crime to some people.

They literally can not wrap their heads around it.

Hell, that whole “Born Sexy Yesterday” video pretty much embodies this! The entire video is basically screaming: “How dare you write about a grown woman who has no sexual experience!? The only way they’d be that ignorant is if they’re a teenager or a child!!!”

Keep reading

mitigatedchaos

those tags though

sinesalvatorem
sinesalvatorem

Welp, I just helped someone discover that someone else was impersonating them online using their name and picture to discredit them. I’m really mad at whoever’s responsible for this, but I’m glad I could help.

mitigatedchaos

It’s strange, really. If there’s a good reason to hate someone, it’s the truth. And thus, this behavior implicitly admits that the hatred of them is likely wrong.

silver-and-ivory
silver-and-ivory

why is it that there is nearly always someone accusing all my favorite characters of being dudebro neckbeard PUA creeps

Snape? entitled Nice Guy

Kylo Ren? whiny white boy with man tears

hpmor!Harry Potter?

Sheldon Cooper on steroids, an amped-up version of every neckbeard asshole I knew back in high school and college who thought being male and possessing some semblance of intelligence made him fucking king of all he surveyed.

>Sheldon Cooper

>neckbeard

huh I wonder why this mysterious pattern keeps happening

mitigatedchaos

STATUSWAR