Violence is a tool, it has a class nature. Our violence is good, because it is liberatory. Without violence, we cannot be liberated.
good to know.
Communists - or White Nationalists?
We report, you decide.
Violence is a tool, it has a class nature. Our violence is good, because it is liberatory. Without violence, we cannot be liberated.
good to know.
Communists - or White Nationalists?
We report, you decide.
Reenactor throws a spear at a drone
What a time to be alive.
“The medieval warrior, realizing the consequences of his impulsive act, immediately approached the owner of the drone and offered to pay for the damage.
The owner of the drone was so impressed by the brilliant attack that he suggested organizing a competition for bringing down “dragons” with short spears next year.
Drone owners have another year to develop a unique “dragon-like” design for their flying machines.” (x)
I am 100% cooler with this knowing that the spear-thrower realized “oops maybe I shouldn’t have done that” and tried to make it right, and that the guy who the drone belonged to was cool with it
just so everyone knows, this has already been memorialized in a runestone

Anonymous asked:
They weren’t showing up for me, so I didn’t notice them. Configbox ticked. Or rather unticked.
“Faith, you need to get to the top of the Atrium. There’s a way out there.”
- Merc, probably
I long thought the City was modeled on Singapore.
Holy shit, Australia is less tolerant of sexual diversity than Ireland.
of course that was 12 months ago, and in the meantime absolutely nothing has changed on this front
of course that was 24 months ago, and in the meantime absolutely nothing has changed on this front
Irony - roping gays into monogamous marriages is likely to decrease sexual promiscuity and rate of disease spread, while increasing family formation, social and societal stability, and mental health.
If we take degeneracy as a concept seriously, then, given that homosexuality remains at a roughly constant rate (not unreasonable), then it is literally less degenerate.
In addition to liking irony I also think the other benefits are good, so of course as the villain I am I support it, just with the caveat that polygamy is still bad.
The issue with racism is that it violates the principle of justice as individual. Someone is being made to suffer for something someone else entirely did, united only by surface characteristics. (E.g., being black is not an ideology and does not cause behavior in the absence of a cultural context which makes it ideological/cultural/political.)
So breaking the principle of individual justice to combat racism probably isn’t such a great idea.
However, while race does not intrinsically alter behavior, culture, ideology, and religion do. Some of this is mostly just aesthetics, like architecture or food. But some of it has much deeper consequences, like multigenerational cousin marriage, or “honor” killings.
However, unlike race (currently), culture is fortunately somewhat mutable. There are limits, however, particularly with regard to ideology.
I guess what I’m saying here is that America should limit the number of North Korean refugees it takes after the War, until it can be determined how safe former adherents of Juche coming over in one mass are, but should be willing to take many thousands of refugees from South Korea after Seoul is destroyed. In-kind aid should be delivered instead, and infrastructure reconstruction should proceed with more funding than originally scheduled.
Anonymous asked:
libfas answered:
>Arab anon is a racist piece of shit that lives on double standards and thinks the world is desperate to spend time in their sandy hell-hole.
Huh, what a surprise…
Wait wait wait libfas-Anon - are you saying ejecting someone from the country for disrespecting the dominant ideology is a good thing? ‘cause I’m confident you won’t like where that goes…
safety vs. comfort
safe spaces vs. comfortable spaces
making someone feel unsafe vs. making someone feel uncomfortable
unsafety vs. discomfort
Easily resolved, friend Argumate. Anyone making my group feel uncomfortable is also making them unsafe.
so Hillary vs. Trump, is that it then?
‘fraid so
Somehow it still is
They want to enforce moral liability for Trump voters, but that only makes sense within the context of the possible alternatives. As such, “Hillary would likely have got the US into a war with Syria right now instead of just doing one missile strike, and the Media would all be cheering her on, further expanding the migrant crisis in Europe” is a valid response. (And I didn’t even vote for Trump, actually.)
Das Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie informiert: Bisexuelle polyamoröse Beziehungen sind effizient!
[The Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy informs us: bisexual polyamorous relationships are efficient.]
must Germans be so determined at living up to stereotypes
This is fake though, right?