1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
routinebitten

Dear Leftists: Stop virtue signaling to make you look good on social media, no amount of virtue signaling is going to bring back the dead or stop the terrorist attacks. You Leftists are morally bankrupt so your virtue signaling is pretentious.

regressive-libtards-are-cancer

If you want to practice Islam in the inconsequential, semi-secular sense. Fine. But the only way to solve this problem is to recognize that POLITICAL Islam and anyone who follows its prescription is inherently incompatible with western values.

That means:

  • Want sharia courts? You’re not welcome. 
  • Think it’s okay to marry a 6 year old? You’re not welcome. 
  • Think it’s okay to strike your wife for ANY reason? You’re not welcome. 
  • Believe in ANY kind of punishment for apostasy? You’re not welcome. 
  • Believe in ANY kind of punishment for “blasphemy”? You’re not welcome. 

Period. These are the kinds of values that progressives would defend against any radical Christians who believe any of the above. And rightfully so. So why can’t we all agree on these universally? Anyone who holds any of those beliefs is by definition, incompatible with the western world.

People are giving President Trump crap for calling them “losers”. Listen, the guy isn’t eloquent, but he’s right. These terrorists fear shame more than death. It’s why Abu Graib was such an outrage when American, female soldiers stripped them naked and laughed at them while dogs barked. To them, that is a far greater punishment than death or even torture. If any American received said treatment at the hands of ISIS, we’d thank the lord above that we weren’t being burnt alive in cages.

We don’t merely punish terrorists through death. We punish them through shame. At least ONE leader is willing to give it the old college try. So today, I stand with the President of the United States, instead of trying to mince words on social media and virtue-signal about how much “unity” we need.

the evil that is political Islam. To unite with it’s practitioners would be to unite with evil. Anyone who sees that as a virtue is simply enabling evil and by proxy, is evil themselves.

routinebitten

can you legitimately imagine waking up and seeing the bombing of innocent people just to see a concert and spouting some pure vitriol like this? like how must it feel to know that you are trying to push your islamaphobic views in the wake of a tragedy like this? like maybe i’m too much of a “morally bankrupt” leftist to get it but ok

mitigatedchaos

“HOW DARE YOU implicate the Communist Party in this famine which was an entirely predictable consequence of Communist policy about which we were warned repeatedly!? Don’t you care about the victims at all?!”

Look man,

I know someone with a URL like libtards-are-cancer is not gonna be the most charitable guy towards liberalism, but these terrorist attacks are ideological in nature, and they were completely preventable. Japan does not have Islamic terrorist attacks, and it is not because they work so hard to love and tolerate Muslims. Unfortunately that ship has sailed, but something different needs to be done, and it starts with acknowledging that there is no law of the universe that religions have to be equally dangerous.

Source: regressive-leftists-are-cancer politics
voxette-vk
voxette-vk

You: “Dude, you are the lamest person imaginable.”

Me: “Impossible! The lamest person imaginable is someone who is lame in all respects and to the highest degree. Now, in the respect of existence, clearly it is lamer not to exist than to exist. Thus, it is impossible that the lamest person imaginable should exist. Therefore, I am not the lamest person imaginable. QED”

mitigatedchaos

Good post OP

mutant-aesthetic
mutant-aesthetic

>wake up with a lot of pent-up aggression and anger with no real viable outlet

Yeah this can’t be healthy lmao

mutant-aesthetic

The funniest thing is that my lack of an outlet is part of the reason I’m so angry. I’m mad because there aren’t really socially accepted spaces for me to vent my emotions, so if I want to talk about how I feel I need to go to the Dark Corners Of The Internet

mitigatedchaos

Also make sure you’re getting your exercise, etc.

argumate
argumate

With Taiwan recognising gay marriages it’s time to update predictions for China, Japan, and Korea.

I still think Korea will be last, but it’s tough to decide whether Japan or China will go first.

Either way if Australia still can’t pull its head out of its butt in the next 24 months someone is going to have to crash another 4wd into parliament house.

nicdevera

Korea will legalize gay marriage long before the Philippines does. 70% of Filipinos “strongly oppose” gay marriage. We’re one of the two countries in the world that don’t even legally allow divorce. It’ll be a long road before gay marriage even enters the Overton window.

argumate

fuck, no divorce yet? someone ought to get on that.

akaltynarchitectonica

I think you’re way too optiministic about China. At best you’ll get some very local recognition in big cities like shanghai, for legal and tax purposes.

argumate

pragmatic!

atrahasis

How would Singapore fare? Would it come in behind China, Korea and Japan?

argumate

wow good question, and what about Hong Kong??

mitigatedchaos

Regarding Singapore, the rumor I’ve heard is that Lee softened on gays in his old age, but they didn’t get rid of the laws so much as not really enforce them. While I admire some of their policies, this is not one of them.