1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
the-grey-tribe
taylor-ruth

it doesn’t sit well with me that “emotional labor” in it’s original context was Arlie Hochschild talking very specifically about how taxing face to face service industry jobs are for people (namely women) with this very nuanced context and is now used in everything from “i had to explain something to someone on twitter” or heavily in contexts of romantic relationships. not all emotional management and exchange is labor! to insert the idea of “labor” excessively into interpersonal relationships creates a system of “i performed ____ and now you OWE me for exerting ____” and it’s not healthy or what the term is for.

shannonwest

I disagree with this so strongly! fair enough I guess if you wanna say it’s been removed from it’s original context but the latter part of this paragraph has construed discussions around emotional labor very dishonestly. I have no idea how you could read women’s discussions around emotional labor and walk away from it thinking it’s women who have created an unhealthy system or are keeping manipulative mental scorecards. that’s not even remotely close to the truth. women use emotional labor to describe specific sexist power dynamics in their relationships with men, where they are expected to perform an unreasonable amount of emotional work because they are women. saying that women are demonstrating unhealthy behaviour by discussing this oppression is pretty next level! 

I understand this may not be the original intention behind the term, but it’s pretty clear there was a gap where women didn’t have the language to describe this oppressive dynamic, and ‘emotional labor’ filled that gap. 

ranma-official

“women are oppressed in consensual romantic relationships they can quit at any point because they experience emotions.”

“men also experience emotions”

“actually, men are meat robots who feel no emotion whatsoever except for the desire to subsume, but nice try”

I explained emotional labor to you in three sentences, don’t thank me.

the-grey-tribe

Ranma, why do you even follow people who are either so negative about human interaction or just blatant trolls? Like you find a troll, identify trolling correctly, and troll back?

mitigatedchaos

Such is life in the Russian Federation.

The system of rulership and social status of post-Communist Russia is based on a hierarchy of internet trolling, and therefore Russians (such as @ranma-official) must constantly engage in acts of internet trolling to protect their status and advance.  

The greatest troll is then made leader of the country.

Oh wait, that’s not Russia.  That’s 2017 America.

Source: taylor-ruth shtpost trump cw
argumate
argumate

people (very briefly) wrote about Bannon as if he was this erudite mastermind of fascist strategy, but I think the narrative will collapse faster than his attempts at passing legislation.

Dubya’s cronies had been kicking around in Washington for decades and had far more institutional experience and they were still a clumsy pack of ideocrats; you wouldn’t expect Bannon to be even on their level.

argumate

mitigatedchaos said: Yeah, I’m going to dredge all the fascist panic up and shove it in peoples’ faces in 4 years at this rate, probably.

“don’t worry, we survived Donald Trump didn’t we?”

“this is different! if you vote for Chelsea Clinton people will die!

mitigatedchaos

Not everyone is going to survive any given Presidency.  Lots of people didn’t survive the Obama Presidency, for instance.

Rather, the specific complaint in this case was that Trump was Fascist and would somehow turn the US into some sort of authoritarian state far exceeding the existing level of wasteful authority.

I’m confident that isn’t going to happen.  Trump is not going to be a military dictator or three-term President.

I’ve been rather annoyed with it, along with the claims of Xism leveled at all opponents, the no-platforming, the enthusiasm for punching ‘Nazis’ that inevitably ends up pepper-spraying bitcoin enthusiasts and cheering physical violence against Libertarians, the racism itself…

politics trump cw
argumate
argumate

Thanks to this healthcare debacle I’m feeling slightly vindicated in my feeling from last year that while Trump might be unprecedented in some ways as a presidential candidate let alone president, the sheer institutional inertia of the state and the gloriously recalcitrant nature of American politics would stymie his ability to radically reshape the nation. I mean it’s still early days, but yeah.

garmbreak1

politics shtpost
argumate

Anonymous asked:

i am a farmer and this is my emoji farm: 😀 😁 😂 😃 😄 😅 😆 😇 😈 😉 😊 😋 😌 😍 😎 😏U+1F61x 😐 😑 😒 😓 😔 😕 😖 😗 😘 😙 😚 😛 😜 😝 😞 😟U+1F62x 😠 😡 😢 😣 😤 😥 😦 😧 😨 😩 😪 😫 😬 😭 😮 😯U+1F63x 😰 😱 😲 😳 😴 😵 😶 😷 😸 😹 😺 😻 😼 😽 😾 😿U+1F64x 🙀 🙁 🙂 🙃 🙄 🙅 🙆 🙇 🙈 🙉 🙊 🙋 🙌 🙍 🙎 🙏

argumate answered:

springing up like weeds

mitigatedchaos

It’s time to go Full Sherman with an Emoji March to the Sea.

shtpost
ranma-official
ranma-official

inb4 glorious revolution

argumate

can someone please explain to me what the heck is going down in Russiatown

ranma-official

1) Small-time opposition politician Navalny spends years campaigning against corruption. No one cares. Politician is written off, albeit harried by frivolous cases.

2) Navalny uncovers a massive corruption and theft scheme Medvedev (premier and party leader) is involved in, shows his wineries and castles. Billions are stolen from the budget. Makes a documentary and a webpage. It goes viral.

3) Navalny organizes protests. Protests are banned almost everywhere in the country.

4) At least a hundred thousand people goes out into the streets to a complete media silence. Some are arrested.

This is on Putin’s anniversary (inauguration on 27 March 00)

5) Navalny gets arrested again, police immediately caught in making fraudulent documents.

6) People are openly discussing this in the street. Pictures go viral. The Streisand effect kicks into gear.


The revolution will not be televised. It will be snapchatted live.

argumate

infernalfarndamn asked:

Why does my theory of gender need to explain camgirls? Unless I'm operating on a different definition of that term.

argumate answered:

Why is camgirl a viable career? Why are there so many camgirls? Why are there so few camgirls? Why are there almost no camboys, and those that do exist are mostly patronised by gay men? What are the demographics of camgirls and their customers, and why? And so on.

mitigatedchaos

No but seriously you already know the real answer, most of your readers should too, you just know it isn’t produced by straight Feminist theory.  You have to mix in a little heterodoxy and some blasphemy to get there.  Stir, pour over ice, drink, and then get banned from the gender discourse for thinking the unthinkable.

Joining the Transhumanists afterwards in a plot to finally escape gender by increasing the morphological freedom of humanity is strictly optional.

You’re right though.  A grand gender theory does need to explain camgirls.  

gender politics i shouldn't blog this so tired