1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
bambamramfan
bambamramfan

All of us, Democrats and Republicans, libertarians and communists, tradcons and feminists and cybertranstopians, believe in philosophies that could, if given real power, do harm to people because of their failings. We can not predict what government enforcement or cultural dominance will really look like, and all the mistakes the fallible humans instituting it will make.

The question is not the purity of our mission at the outset, but if, when confronted with these grievances, will we acknowledge them and try to fix them, or will we declare all complaints as trivial, hoaxes, distractions, “not the real problem,” and double down on our vision?

Tell me you’ll give a damn when the errors start mounting up in lives destroyed, and I don’t really care what form of government you pursue.

mitigatedchaos

I’m sympathetic to this, though finding someone who is both that pragmatic and that compassionate is difficult, much less putting them in power.

ranma-official
dunkaroos

why do grown ass men at my work think it’s a compliment to say things like, “it’s so endearing that you’re such a nerd but if you were a guy i’d totally wanna be you up for being a loser!!! hahahaha!!!” fuck off jesus

official-mugi

“since I wanna fuck you I don’t think you’re a loser”

mitigatedchaos

To be a woman is to be mid-status.

To be a man is to be high-status or low-status.

Source: dunkaroos gender politics
isaacsapphire
thetrippytrip

This is disgustingly ableist. Disabled people have worth, their labor has value, they’re working just like everyone else so they should get paid as much as everyone else. Why are we debating this??? It’s common sense!

doctorcassherlockedfromtheimpala

I’m so salty about this i have to reblog it again. WE’RE TALKING ABOUT A HUMAN BEING WORKING FOR A LIVING. NO YOU SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO PAY THEM LOWER THAN MINIMUM WAGE. WHAT THE FUCK.

agingwunderkind

workers of the world, be against this shit in particular

jumpingjacktrash

if someone is ‘allowed’ to work for less than minimum wage, they will be forced to work for less than minimum wage.

vastderp

i just found out our cleaners make below min wage, and are paid different amounts according to how much they can do…

jumpingjacktrash

yet another fucked up thing about your building management, jeez

i wonder if we can pester the city about that

fierceawakening

Iirc that is actually how subminimum wage works. It’s based on the idea that a disabled worker is less productive than a nondisabled one, so they only get paid a portion of the money, based on their productivity compared to the standard.

bittersnurr

Yeah that is generally how it works I think.

I have no idea how they would measure that either like, I feel like some of the “lack of productivity” is “we are too lazy to accommodate you so you can work at normal speed even if it’s literally GIVING YOU A STOOL or something that costs us basically nothing so here’s some spare change”.

fierceawakening

Mm, I do think it’s possible for disability to affect productivity. I just don’t think “not paying people minimum wage” is a solution to that issue.

isaacsapphire

I’d like to have a better understanding of this issue. The disabled people that I’ve known to be involved in work programs, they weren’t hirable by regular employers, and they were not capable of working at the speed that is expected of abled minimum wage workers.

The Walmart I worked at had a mentally disabled girl working in the department next to mine, because they had a program with a local idk what the proper term is, it was a kind of adulthood transition halfway house type thing. And Walmart actually hired on permanent, for regular wages, some of the disabled people, because they were perfectly good workers at particular jobs (cart pusher is a big one, and the community at that Walmart, back in the good times, they loved and protected our cartpushers. Everybody was very upset when somebody did a hit and run on one of them. Thankfully no permanent injuries, but still!) But the girl in the department next to mine, she couldn’t focus well enough to do the work, so they didn’t hire her permanently.

Also, I’ve yet to hear of anyone who was actually expected to support themselves on subminimum wage: they’re always on government assistance and usually have family support of some kind, and their “work” seem to be more of an enrichment program than a job.

mitigatedchaos

You’ve probably seen me blogging about this before, @isaacsapphire, but… wage subsidies.

This all becomes way less of an issue with direct-to-employee hourly wage subsidies, enabling us to have a whole lot of things like high employment, job choice (actual job choice), and livable income for those low on the income scale at the same time.

If it’s cheap enough, someone will be able to find something productive for them to do, and with the subsidies this won’t mean scraping by on the bottom of the barrel.

Source: spectator.co.uk politics
ranma-official
kunsthalles

y'all need something better to do

loryisunabletosupinate

oh lol, i thought they were talking about this:

>implying green text kills the romance

jcurmudgeon

This article is a fucking ride. My favourite part is:

“The other night I slept with this lawyer from Happn,” Calvin chimed in, “and afterward he suggested we watch a movie, and then got out a PC. It was a literal Windows moment. I was like, ‘Does the Internet even exist on a computer like that? Does it have to be plugged into a wall? Do you want to make a spreadsheet while we’re at it?’ I was really turned off. Is there such a thing as a tech boner? Because if so, I had whatever the opposite of that is.” 

ranma-official

What the fuck

mitigatedchaos

No no, this is good.  It makes it easier not to contribute to spreading the genes of people who only exist to maximize social status.

Source: kontrollsysteme shtpost
argumate

Anonymous asked:

It's not necessarily a "fail" if the min-maxing is itself enjoyable, especially if the thing you're min-maxing is itself recreational and not subject to any particular time pressure. I suspect that sometimes when the thing *isn't* recreational, then min-maxing is a subtle attempt to wring some kind of enjoyment out of the process.

argumate answered:

Valid points!

ranma-official
ranma-official

I was wondering why Dubya is being marketed lately. Turns out he is releasing a book of portraits of soldiers wounded in his wars, all profits go to their rehab.

I… don’t know how to feel about this.

mitigatedchaos

It’s easier to imagine that he didn’t care, and sent them away to fight solely for his own benefit.

I think maybe he cared, but many of the people around him didn’t, and those who did were blinded by ideology.

I think it’s alright to feel okay about this book.  It’s a net improvement in this timeline, isn’t it?

What happens if people can’t own nations?

What’s the plan here for open borders, dissolution of nations stuff?

I mean, let’s stop and think about this for a minute.

Presumably, open borders will still be accompanied by democracy by geographical area.  In the interests of fairness, voting will also be extended to migrants.

However, there is no limit on the number of people that can move into an area in a given timeframe, as this would end up being considered some form of discrimination.  This means that in any year, the people living somewhere could effectively have themselves replaced with a migrant population that then changes all the laws to suit them.

Since the residents lack the ability to exclude people from the government, they lack the ability to control it, and thus don’t effectively own it, since the ability to exclude is one of the core things that ownership is about.

Which, sure, people have been saying “it’s not YOUR government!” and talking about how people don’t have the right to exclude those of other cultures (while either letting cruelties like FGM off the hook, or pretending it isn’t cultural).

But if they don’t own it, why in the world would they fight for it?  Why would they fight to defend a government that doesn’t belong to them, doesn’t care about them, and at any time could be taken away from them and looted by others?  In a war, why wouldn’t they just leave the territory?  If environmental issues become a problem, why not just contribute to them until it’s unprofitable, and then flee?

Some modern countries are already having problems getting enough personnel to staff their armies as it is, and we’re not even halfway this far into Globalism.

Who will fight and die to protect their access to consumer products?  Who will fight to protect the rights of others that don’t care about them or their values at all?  For a territory that isn’t even really theirs?

All you’re left with are mercenaries.  And mercenaries are a terrible option, known all the way back in the days of Machiavelli.

But there are other group memberships that people might be willing to fight for.  Ethnic groups, as have been a source of fighting for dominance throughout the ages.  Religions, which promise eternal reward after death.  Drug cartels and other criminal organizations, with the promise of great payout for the desperate in this life, regardless of whether it’s true.  Right-wing and left-wing paramilitaries that are dedicated to ideology.

And, as this starts spiraling out of control, sub-national organizations that, ostensibly, originated for mutual defense.  

Having defeated the nation-state, the monopoly on violence loosens, and the fighting shifts to the sub-national level.

politics nationalism flagpost