1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
thathopeyetlives

ranma-official asked:

I am "this is bad, but criminal abortions are so much worse" pro-choice, not "FUCK YEAH! DEAD FETII FOR EVERYONE!" pro-choice. Framing pro-life as men forcing their opinions onto women sounds obviously wrong to me. What's your estimate on gender composition in pro-life?

thathopeyetlives answered:

I don’t know. I don’t think it’s hugely disparate.


I… Can’t really confidently accept that. Like, I agree that just criminalizing abortion in a country accustomed to having it legal, and not doing anything else, would be spectacularly ineffective and destructive.

But we have to actually end it. I’m not willing to lie to myself.

mitigatedchaos

Speaking of being honest: actually ending it would require standardized physical or genetic modifications to humans to change how reproduction works such that pregnancy is purely voluntary and disconnected from sex. I can’t see any other way that doesn’t result in illegal abortions being performed which does not require police state theocracy or even greater violations.

That, of course, leaves out the entire discussion on how “ensoulment” works, and ways in which ensouled matter must necessarily behave differently from unensouled matter if souls aren’t just glorified backup devices.

politcs gender politics abortion
wirehead-wannabe
thathopeyetlives

First question: What does one even do about Russia secretly interfering with our politics? If people are actually involved (and apparently Flynn was) you can impeach or disqualify them. Trump has been president for a few weeks and has managed to screw up royally, so we could kick him out, but earlier on… you’re kinda out of luck unless you want to totally screw up the politics. 

Second question: What is actually going on? Is Trump genuinely trying to be friends with Russia and enemies with China (stupid plan in a world that successfully avoids war!) or just Putin wants to weaken the USA with idiot leaders or what?

wirehead-wannabe

My gut feeling is that either that Putin blackmailing/threatening/bribing Trump, or that authoritarian leaders with a socially conservative support base flock together. Or both.

mitigatedchaos

Russia + China is not an unreasonable combination.  So yes, I think preventing that is part of it.  China is about to enter a period of decline, but it’s still more likely to become a global hegemon than Russia.

I think there are several things going on here.

  • Trump actually does have some level of respect for authoritarian rulers, I think.  Even I sometimes look at China and think about what could be accomplished if all the NIMBYs were stopped from holding up projects, even though I know actually doing that wouldn’t work out so well.  But I think half of it on Trump’s part is just signalling.
  • The sanctions over the Ukraine, as far as I can remember, have not actually been lifted and are likely to stay in place, as far as I can tell.
  • Russia itself is less powerful than it has been, both in terms of its economy and its conventional military.  They couldn’t really invade America even if they wanted to, and they aren’t going to become a global hegemon.  China is a much greater threat to America’s global power long-term, depending on just how bad all their looming crises become.  China also sticks out more to his base because it wasn’t Russia that the jobs got offshored to.
  • Trump is probably seeking to cooperate with Russia when it suits America’s interests, rather than just fight Russia across the board.  In part, he wants to signal this to Moscow.
    • This also depends on just how you define “America’s interests”.  If you think of democracy or global capitalism as being synonymous with “America’s interests”, then I don’t think Trump agrees with you.
  • Trump probably does find Islam threatening in a way that he does not actually find Christians, Hindus, gays, transgender people, etc threatening.  So, let’s suppose he wants to drain the migrants out of Europe.  Right-wing parties are gaining steam, and others are shifting right on the issue.  But so long as there is nowhere to put the migrants, the media can pelt the nativists with stories about migrant suffering.  Enter the Syrian “safe zones” plan from his campaign.  Paying off the construction of temporary housing and mass issuing of rations is cheaper than a lot of military action, it keeps the migrants out of Europe, and it creates somewhere to put them for when they leave Europe without triggering the same level of media-based political fallout.  However, to do this, he needs support from Russia/Putin.
    • Trump is signalling that he does not care if Syria is ruled by a tyrant.  He’s willing to compromise if it gets him his safe zones.
Source: thathopeyetlives politics trump
argumate

Health insurance must pay for exoskeletons #1yrago

mostlysignssomeportents

An independent review board has ordered an unspecified health insurer in the northeastern USA to reimburse a patient for a $69,500 exoskelton from Rewalk, whose products enable people with spinal cord injuries to walk.

The board found that the exoskeleton was “medically necessary.”

https://boingboing.net/2016/02/19/health-insurance-must-pay-for.html

argumate

this is awesome but you know, anyone still wondering why healthcare eats up more and more of GDP

anaisnein

Not that I’ve looked at the math or anything, it’s 2:40 am and no. But unless there’s a digit missing in that pricing, the health economics of that thing have got to be a total slam-dunk. I don’t doubt the payor resisted paying because resisting payment is what payors do. If it’s a novel device that isn’t on approved formulary lists, which probably if new thing and not many candidates, that alone is plenty for at least one line of nope. It doesn’t require an actual rational objection based on the value proposition. SOP would be bog-standard automatic bureaucratic obstructionism framed as a best practice in cost consciousness. It’s only a story because someone got pissed off enough to deploy the courts and a journalist thought the device looked cool.

Try pricing five days in the critical care unit on a ventilator for a dying eighty-seven-year-old with advanced dementia, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease, found short of breath and tachycardic in bed at the nursing home, rushed to the hospital, and admitted with sepsis and pulmonary edema. Including imaging and cath lab. Then get back to me about unjustifiable Cadillac expenditures on luxurious medical devices that enable (a very small number of) paralyzed people with normal life expectancies to walk again, for less than it costs to put a remote monitoring device into a heart failure patient’s chest, which, statistically, costs less than *not* doing that because it reduces hospitalizations by just a tad.

Source: mostlysignssomeportents healthcare politics
argumate
argumate

maybe we do need a Muslim registry so we can make sure citizens are obeying Islamic law and only marrying other Muslims, just like in Malaysia

mitigatedchaos

You joke about that, but right wingers think that’s exactly what will happen if Muslims get a majority… and I can’t see anything to really prove them wrong on it.

argumate

This is why every political debate feels like arguing with the mirror: why would people who fear and detest Islamic law push for something common in countries which follow Islamic law, and why would their opponents oppose it.

(Rhetorical question, but still).

mitigatedchaos

You already know the answer to this one. American right-wingers want a Muslim registry with fingerprints and DNA samples for testing bombs, not one with marital status for limiting marriages to Muslims. As for the Left, they don’t want Muslims to actually practice Islam; they want Muslims to become the equivalent of non-practicing Catholics or something along those lines.

bambamramfan
bambamramfan

aka Decius

Okay this is mostly hilarious as a profile of some NRXer’s online presence in a way that probably feels deeply familiar to anyone reading this from the dashboard of tumblr dot com.

Probably not actually relevant as a political matter, because he was an appointee of Flynn and so unlikely to stick around.

And not to be grinding too much of an anti-right hammer today, you can see how David fucking Plouffe (aka the engineer of Obama’s grassroots army in 2008) was fined by an ethics board for improper lobbying for Uber.

It’s not the individual, it’s the system.

mitigatedchaos

Honestly, I didn’t find anything in there particularly outrageous. Homogenous societies do seem to have the better stats he mentions, Islamist terrorists really do exist and would love to nuke New York. I think the risk he assigns it is overestimated, but potential nuclear attack is one reason I don’t want to live in New York.

politics