1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
westfailia
westfailia

if i hear another pseudo-intellectual white boy say “overpopulation” i s2g

westfailia

like alright malthus if the population reaches a billion we’ll all starve we heard you in 1798

mitigatedchaos

If I recall correctly, as the number of children per household declines, the amount of parental investment in each child increases along with educational attainment and development.

In other words, aside from other matters (which are not trivial), not having so many children might contribute to the economic development of underdeveloped areas, and thus their ability to have nice things like modern hospitals.  Are you against this?

politics
diarrheaworldstarhiphop

Anonymous asked:

Do you think the guerrilla destruction of that Confederate statue will lead to "revenge" destruction of other memorials and display pieces?

diarrheaworldstarhiphop answered:

i dont think so

conservatives are more restrained when it comes to destruction of public property, often because they respect order over anarchy.

diarrheaworldstarhiphop

nevermind

mitigatedchaos

Social Justice Capture Destroy the Flag is back on!

Boy this year’s new season of America sure is something.  

politics torches in the night
mitigatedchaos

Anonymous asked:

As I told the fool mutant-aesthetic, his talk of a domestic insurrection is the empty rhetoric of a subnormal piss-streaked goon. How many divisions does "No" Dick Spencer have? Do you believe the US Army would join a Slaver's Rebellion Dignity Rebellion? This "insurrection" of a few dozen pasty fat white men could be stopped by four bored black cops but would be crushed mercilessly by a hundred times its number in feds.

mitigatedchaos answered:

You don’t need to be big enough to launch an actual civil war in order to cause significant economic damage and psychic panic, particularly in a developed nation where people aren’t used to infrastructure disruptions.

Maybe you lot should quit trying to reawaken white racial consciousness and just put all those statues into museums and rename the parks after other suitable historical figures (pre civil war ones might be a good choice), not that the statues are really the chief cause, they’re just a point of friction for it to surface.

Either give up on collective intergenerational ethnic justice, or give up on shifting the demographics.  You can’t have both and not get a rise in ethnonationalism, seeing as it involves yelling “you are [ethnicity]!  You are not allowed to identify as anything other than [ethnicity]!”

Supposedly you guys were all-powerful before, but you got an orange internet meme elected President as backlash which you lot said wouldn’t happen, and at this rate he may well be re-elected.

mitigatedchaos

Like, I don’t think you guys understand just how fragile modern civilization, with its economically efficient just-in-time logistics, is.

Those radical Muslim bombers and van attackers?  We’re very lucky that they’re doing it for self-gratifying glory about some mythical martyrs’ afterlife.  Attacking concerts and random people in the street isn’t how you start a race war or a civil war.

People need to be desperate.

I don’t want to go into it, because I don’t want to give anyone ideas, but we have been very lucky that most terrorists so far have been either crazy, ideology-huffed, or morons.

Now, if I were in charge, we’d have all sorts of mechanisms in place to prevent people from becoming desperate in a variety of situations, including the predicted Pacific Northwest quake that’s expected to come some time this century.  But hey, I’m just some lunatic, right?

politics

Anonymous asked:

As I told the fool mutant-aesthetic, his talk of a domestic insurrection is the empty rhetoric of a subnormal piss-streaked goon. How many divisions does "No" Dick Spencer have? Do you believe the US Army would join a Slaver's Rebellion Dignity Rebellion? This "insurrection" of a few dozen pasty fat white men could be stopped by four bored black cops but would be crushed mercilessly by a hundred times its number in feds.

You don’t need to be big enough to launch an actual civil war in order to cause significant economic damage and psychic panic, particularly in a developed nation where people aren’t used to infrastructure disruptions.

Maybe you lot should quit trying to reawaken white racial consciousness and just put all those statues into museums and rename the parks after other suitable historical figures (pre civil war ones might be a good choice), not that the statues are really the chief cause, they’re just a point of friction for it to surface.

Either give up on collective intergenerational ethnic justice, or give up on shifting the demographics.  You can’t have both and not get a rise in ethnonationalism, seeing as it involves yelling “you are [ethnicity]!  You are not allowed to identify as anything other than [ethnicity]!”

Supposedly you guys were all-powerful before, but you got an orange internet meme elected President as backlash which you lot said wouldn’t happen, and at this rate he may well be re-elected.

politics racepol anons asks
esoteric-hoxhaism

Anonymous asked:

Why can't they see that we just want to guarantee our existence as a group?

mutant-aesthetic answered:

that can’t be permitted according to them because their moral philosophy requires unilateral world domination with no exit for dissenters

mitigatedchaos

Honestly, it’s too bad “create some tiny white ethnostate and have all the white nationalists go there” isn’t an option.  There are enough chunks of land available to make it happen.

Over the short term it would be opposed for all the usual reasons, but of course over the long term there would be a demand to dismantle it as a moral imperative, on the grounds that white nationalists do not deserve to exist (even though the same people would continue to allow other forms of ethnic/racial nationalism).

And of course Whitopia would probably suck, because WNs are not usually the best stock of white people.  But who cares?  It’s an opt-in community, no one has to live there.

I don’t expect much if any external terrorism to occur following its formation, and if small, it couldn’t successfully invade anywhere anyway.

Also it might fall over arguments about who really counts as white, but eh, once they all move there it’s not my problem.

esoteric-hoxhaism

the reason a tiny white ethnostate isn’t an option is that they tried to coordinate and move to leith, a town in north dakota with a population of twelve, and this became a huge international story and got shut down.

dissent exists to legitimize authority’s rule, and don’t you forget it. the system needs white nationalists, and needs them to stay around, so it can justify its perpetual expansion of its own power. leith wasn’t allowed because leith wasn’t useful to the system. charlottesville was allowed because it was. 

mitigatedchaos

Well, we had a war over secession already, and ideological grounds are sufficient by themselves to create that response without planning by the ruling political class.

The ideology of human rights, as backed by Progressivism or Liberalism, is universalist.  It either applies everywhere, or it applies nowhere.  The idea of different rules for different groups, living in different geographic areas, is Nationalist and in opposition to this.  To accept the existence of a tiny WN city-state is to implicitly accept that the universalism of Progressivism or Liberalism, which they use as their basis, is untrue.

Even if it’s just a means to contain the KKK so they shut up and quit causing problems for everyone else.

Source: mutant-aesthetic politics
mutant-aesthetic

Anonymous asked:

Why can't they see that we just want to guarantee our existence as a group?

mutant-aesthetic answered:

that can’t be permitted according to them because their moral philosophy requires unilateral world domination with no exit for dissenters

mitigatedchaos

Honestly, it’s too bad “create some tiny white ethnostate and have all the white nationalists go there” isn’t an option.  There are enough chunks of land available to make it happen.

Over the short term it would be opposed for all the usual reasons, but of course over the long term there would be a demand to dismantle it as a moral imperative, on the grounds that white nationalists do not deserve to exist (even though the same people would continue to allow other forms of ethnic/racial nationalism).

And of course Whitopia would probably suck, because WNs are not usually the best stock of white people.  But who cares?  It’s an opt-in community, no one has to live there.

I don’t expect much if any external terrorism to occur following its formation, and if small, it couldn’t successfully invade anywhere anyway.

Also it might fall over arguments about who really counts as white, but eh, once they all move there it’s not my problem.

racepol politics
Top Photos