1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

The year is 2033…

Under the direction of the Australian Environmental Working Group, an army of thousands of killer snakebots, created by the Omega Corporation, has been unleashed to eliminate cane toads from the continent.  No one thought it could go wrong.

Now the killer snakebots have been hijacked by a vicious terrorist group, and only one man can stop them…  the man that created them.

As long as you use an expansive definition of the term ‘man’.

Mechanical Dingo Pictures presents

Owlback II: Revengeance

( @argumate )

mitigated fiction argumate shtpost augmented reality break the year is
discoursedrome

As social media centralized, blogging’s core infrastructure has withered #1yrago

mostlysignssomeportents


When “social media” meant “blogs,” there were many tools, services and protocols that comprised an infrastructure for federated, open, loosely joined interaction: the rise of the social giants has killed off much of this infrastructure, all but erasing it from our memories.

Anil Dash compares the services and tools available in the new centralized web, and the new advantages of centralization, and also the lost functionality that disappeared with independent blogging. It must be said that some of these tools were already in critical condition as centralization took off, killed by the spam and other parasitic infestations that are endemic to complex, open ecosystems.

https://boingboing.net/2016/08/11/as-social-media-centralized-b.html

argumate

winner takes all

discoursedrome

unpopular opinion: people need to stop using Discord chats and get back on IRC

mitigatedchaos

IRC, which won’t give me the records of all that chatting that occurred when my phone bounced online and offline twenty times in the last hour?

We don’t access the internet only from our desktop computers anymore, you know.

Source: mostlysignssomeportents

Anonymous asked:

Just wrote a script that printed out "Scott is a Neoreactionary" 10000 times. Now we shall finally find out what the platonic ideal form of rightwing-ness is.

You didn’t know?

Scott is already the most powerful Neoreactionary that has ever lived.  

Even from within the tenth circle of the seventh star of the dark sun, chained in magical bindings by the Eight Scholars of Justice Eternal, pursued relentlessly by the Harbingers of Anti-Fate, his power leaks through into our world, disguised as “steelmanned” defenses of Liberalism.

Every word uttered in his true form converts ten children to the principles of sidereal nationalism.  It is through only his whispers that the one known as Moldbug came to Awakeness.  His mere gaze shatters all known forms of modernity.

He cannot stop, and he cannot be stopped.

It was the breaking of the fifth seal, causing parts of our world to come unmoored from Time, which allowed me to enter the past and spread my message of darkness.

shtpost politics the rationalists chronofelony augmented reality break anons asks
argumate
argumate

we live in a world where you can claim that the field of computing is fundamentally broken because it rests on principles discovered by white men and you won’t get laughed off the stage

mitigatedchaos

There are still places you will, it’s just that the list of those places is shrinking.

Of course, creating this environment has its costs, much like you’ll find in some Eastern European thoughts on Communism - once such a thing is enacted, the conversions against it are permanent.

argumate
balioc

Because “diversity” doesn’t mean what it’s usually made to mean.

mitigatedchaos

This is not the diversity post I have been putting off writing, but it is adjacent to it.

argumate

no one actually cares about diversity of ideas when they say diversity, which just means “stable tribal representation”

mitigatedchaos

Argumate, I demand we instantiate the maximum possible number of ethnic groups in order to maximize diversity.  If we work hard at it, we can approach a distribution of N groups, each with their own language, practices, and styles of dress, where N is the size of the population, then get passed over for admission to Harvard.

Source: balioc shtpost
argumate
argumate

Harvard University has been named in a complaint by a group of several dozen Asian Americans claiming discrimination in the university admissions process. They make the statistically justified claim that Asians need higher grades and test scores to be admitted.

Yet despite the alleged injustice, more than 20 per cent of the students admitted are Asian American, while Asian Americans make up only about 6 per cent of the US population. Since one can expect ability to be evenly distributed across all ethnic groups, this looks less like injustice than a problematical definition of “better-qualified”.

http://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2106030/why-asian-americans-claim-harvard-admissions-bias-misses

if your academic results don’t qualify you to get into Harvard, why should your Harvard results qualify you to get into anything else ya fuckin’ walnut

mitigatedchaos

Just do it by socio-economic status and ignore race entirely.  Insomuch as socioeconomic status is not distributed equally by race, this will alter your school’s incoming social balance.

But of course, you, thinking it’s about work times ability, are ignoring that the purpose of Harvard is to some degree about politics and connections, not advancing the national interest through maximizing graduating class economic potential.

In other words, just what is it that Harvard qualifies one to get in to?  Perhaps not the same thing as MIT.

racepol
balioc
balioc

Because “diversity” doesn’t mean what it’s usually made to mean.

mitigatedchaos

This is not the diversity post I have been putting off writing, but it is adjacent to it.

politics gendpol
nuclearspaceheater

To my friends on the spectrum, let me explain to you an unspoken social rule that possibly nobody has ever explained to you before

lierdumoa

If a neurotypical asks you, “What game are you playing?” they’re not asking you to describe the game.

They’re asking you if they can play too.

If a neurotypical asks you, “What are you watching?” they’re not asking you to explain the plot of the movie/tv show to them.

They’re asking if they can watch it with you.

.

When neurotypicals ask you “What are you doing?” 

  • What you think they’re asking: “Please explain to me what you are doing.” 
  • What they’re actually asking:  “Can I join you?”

Now here’s the really fucked up part. If you start explaining to them what you’re doing? They will interpret that as a rejection. 

  • What you think you’re saying: [the answer to their question]
  • What they think you’re saying: This is an elite and exclusive activity for a level 5 friend and you are a level 1 acquaintance. You are not qualified to join me because you don’t know all this stuff. Go away.

.

This is why neurotypicals think you’re being cold and antisocial.

IT’S ALL A HORRIBLE MISCOMMUNICATION.

bonehandledknife

I didn’t realize, even thought it took me almost three decades to learn this, that this was such a paradigm changing realization until we had our conversation today.

But it really really is. One of the most bewildering realizations I’ve had is most people don’t talk to learn things unless its related to work or directly towards their own hobbies, all the words and questions are bonding questions if done socially. They are “lets make friends” questions.

So if I answer their question without an opportunity for the person asking the question to give a response or to join in somehow, the asker feels alienated and starts shutting down.

Example: what are you reading?

True answer but not what they’re looking for: Title of book

Best answer for social scenarios where I want to retain/create friendship: This book is about x and y but it has z that i know u have an interest in too.


Example: what are you doing?

True answer but not: drawing

Best answer for friends: I’m drawing but would u like company while I’m working?


And sometimes frankly I’m not in a headspace where I can process people so the answer is something like, “I would like to do something in a day or later, do you want to plan something?”

Tldr: communication is wierd

survivablyso

HOLY

SHIT

that explains so fucking much thank you

(why the fuck do neurotypicals never just day what they mean ie hey this show looks cool mind if I join you)

bonehandledknife

Further annoying?

They don’t realize that’s what they’re asking and they just feel rejected and go away. So you can’t even ask them what you did wrong because they can’t even put a finger on why they feel the way they do they just know you made them feel bad for some undefined reason.

notyourexrotic

They don’t want to impose or be a burden.

elanorpam

oh fuck me so that’s why when little me asked peeps what they were playing and whether I could watch, the answer was “nonya business” and “fuck off” for no reason i could fathom

they assumed i was intruding in their activity and its social circle

fuck my autistic ass finally all that random jerkassery makes sense

dude i just wanted to see how a game boy looked like

jumpingjacktrash

gdi nt’s would you please just say what you mean

you don’t ask the real question because you don’t trust me enough to give me the opportunity to say no, and when i answer the question you literally asked, you take that as ‘no’ and get upset

it’s really unfair

i think this is a case where allistics are the impaired ones

nuclearspaceheater

Basically my own reaction to suggestions like this.

Source: lierdumoa
slatestarscratchpad

Anonymous asked:

Why do male characters in older books seem so -- there is no other way to say it -- gay? They cry, they swim naked with their friends, they hug and talk about how much they love each other, etc...

slatestarscratchpad answered:

I heard the theory that if homosexuality is so beyond the pale as to be socially impossible, then there’s no need to avoid potential signals of homosexuality. Right now men don’t do those things because if they did, everyone would assume they’re gay. If the assumption is nobody’s gay, you can do whatever you want without signaling anything.

I don’t know how true this is, someone like ozymandias271 might know more.

mitigatedchaos

That’s certainly my read on the situation, at least for the West. It will start to relax over time, I think.

gendpol