Like if you have a consensus that everyone should commit $X for common good but it’s not enforced, then each individual has temptation to withhold their own contribution, knowing that it won’t count for much in the scheme of things.
If only the morally virtuous contribute and the rest do not, then over time the morally unvirtuous end up controlling most of the assets in society. Great!
Yeah, this was my argument, but they didn’t accept it.