mitigatedchaos

dronegoddess-deactivated2017053

uncharitable

More you might like

mitigatedchaos

argumate

“but how will I ever be able to get laid if modern culture frowns upon me getting coworkers drunk and making out with them against their mumbled protestations?? it’s not like my wife is gonna sleep with me lol”

decameter

I have not actually worked out how modern culture proposes people are meant to get laid.

I mean, people obviously seem to be doing it, but there appears to be no acceptable strategy.

mitigatedchaos

You ignore the recommendations, and prove how manly you are by taking on the risk anyway, getting shut down viciously if you’re too low-status.

The problem is that any permissible channel will be FLOODED due to the mismatch between the demand for sex from women and demand for sex from men, at least at the noisiest age pools.

Secondly, straight women (generally, on average) do not want to initiate beyond the barest hints, ones that are plausibly deniable if she turns out not to be wanted by that particular guy, leaving her sense of being desirable intact.

What is going to change this is early Transhumanism, as it’s going to alter the sex ratio and potentially result in an increase in bisexuality.

I mean, in practice I used a dating website, which implicitly includes the idea that everyone there for dating is there for dating, and specifies their orientation, so if you don’t have “short/long-term dating” and so on your profile, no fuck for you,

but I don’t necessarily match the patterns of other people, so this may not be actionable advice.

mitigatedchaos

Anyhow, to add on to this, revealing you find someone hot when you’re attempting to extract resources or in a high-stakes …relationship negotiation? …hurts your bargaining position.

At least, you can still get away with pretending that you have to be won over (and showered in all the resources that “winning over”) requires, so long as there are more incoming proposals than outgoing ones, such that the norm is they have to approach you if they find you hot.

As the sex ratio changes, this becomes less and less feasible.

Since I expect a decent-sized chunk of people (3-5%) to “exit” from being male (as we know it) once the technology improves, that throws the bargaining out of whack, as does bisexuality, which means you’re competing with more people for a higher virtual gender ratio… or something. Naturally, once being a sex is more voluntary, what being that sex means changes as well.

Source: argumate gendpol uncharitable mitigated future

@ranma-official

“Of course,” said the moderate, as the ethnic violence increased in the country and multi-generational child sex trafficking rings set up in the cities, “some may die, but isn’t our vision of a tolerant and diverse society worth it?”

: /

I know, this is very deeply uncharitable of me. Something about this latest attack has me on edge. I think it’s that I see a path from here to ethnic tension criticality in England, which, with the previous attacks being a cycle of terrorism vs military campaigns, I didn’t.

politics

I hope the corrupt officials of the Earth Sphere Federation throw every Globalist in jail for meaningless political crimes. Because that’s where this ends. But they’ll throw me in instead. If there is one world government, there can be no place for me.

An Earth Federation will not allow cultural enclaves that might challenge its power, that exclude people it politically favors. It won’t allow that kind of gated community, much less a full-blown city-state. And there will be nowhere to go except Space.

grumpy uncharitable mitigated future

funereal-disease

fierceawakening

http://sharkodactyl.tumblr.com/post/165166952339

totally, obnoxiously, horribly uncharitable:

can i want to fuck the monster girls tho

because i’m like them and they’re like me and we both need someone

funereal-disease

also like

“every kind of woman is sexualized”

no, they really aren’t. and the insistence that they are is very typical of a certain kind of abled feminism. the kind that insists that all women are drowning in catcalls when some women would give their left tit to be considered someone’s, anyone’s, lust object.

Source: fierceawakening monstergirl discourse gendpol

remedialaction

mitigatedchaos

This conversation has negative value to me now. It went back up for a while because examining morality at the subindividual level was an interesting and novel idea sparked by it, something to be integrated into a later body of theory, but I see there’s nothing more to be mined from the conversation. Anarcho-Capitalism remains an unworthy ideology every time I revisit it.

I’ll keep going for a while longer if you’re willing to apologize for your “let it go” bullshit, but otherwise we’re done. There’s more profit to be made elsewhere, and what do AnCaps love if not markets?

Source: mitigatedchaos uncharitable

They can’t undo Toxic Masculinity, because they don’t understand Masculinity, and they don’t want to.

…because that would mean understanding things about themselves that they don’t want to understand, either.

gendpol uncharitable

bambamramfan

Liberal pundits are over-focused on proving that Trump is a dishonest idiot, and under-focused on why being a a dishonest idiot *matters*.

mitigatedchaos

Pundits are usually trash. Focusing on the meta would out them as dishonest idiots for their trashy ideological cheerleading.

uncharitable

thathopeyetlives

ranma-official

@mitigatedchaos

There’s no logical proof that they can declaw all religions equally, or that the distribution of violence is the same at the tails of all otherwise-declawed religions, though.

Religions are declawed in a secular society naturally as long as no deliberate action (that ensues resistance) is taken. Christianity is very heavily fragmented and society in general has done a really good job declawing it. We are at a “you can’t even prove if God exists or not” level right now. That’s an absurd step down from the absolute majority of humanity’s history

slartibartfastibast

What if your religion expressly forbids secular government/society?

ranma-official

Gets declawed and settles down. Most religions are against any government ever overriding religious laws.

slartibartfastibast

How do you prevent reversion to non-secular society when you constantly import (and don’t police) extremely conservative people that have been cousin-marrying since classical antiquity? Do you know about clannishness vs. W.E.I.R.D.ness?

isaacsapphire

The allure of sexy secular people, particularly young women, is an extremely well established method of getting the second generation immigrants to defect from their culture.

thathopeyetlives

Well, the Gods of the Copybook Headings with monkhood and marriage return, I guess.

I doubt that’s a long term solution. Eventually the sex and apostasy gets boring and then memory and hopes of marriage call one back, maybe to a better place than one was in at first. It happened to me.

mitigatedchaos

#plz no declaw

You’re Christian. Your religion’s central idea of martyrdom, as popularly understood, and brutally oversimplified, involves the government nailing some guy to a stick.

And in this sense, “declawed” refers primarily to religiously-motivated violence, though I suppose it also refers to virality, which is also a (longer-term) risk factor.

So as you might gather, it isn’t Christianity with its “render unto Caesar” and liberal democratic governments that I’m worried about. Nor Buddhism, nor Hinduism…

Anyhow, I think some of the rampant sex culture will decline on its own even without religion, just from people noticing what they previously weren’t socially allowed to notice - most people do seem to emotionally bond from sex, so for most people it really isn’t just some fun casual activity to do with randoms, and also long-term accomplishment tends to build a higher baseline level of happiness than momentary hedonism.

Source: ranma-official religion uncharitable cw

Libertarianism / AnarchoCapitalism / Minarchism - The belief that class action lawsuit waivers as mandatory conditions of employment show that low-level employees really want this and deserve it, and that there is no sort of questionable negotiating leverage involved which might undermine the sanctity of the deal.

uncharitable the invisible fist

the-grey-tribe

The unfortunate reality is that some of the MRA’s claims are undoubtedly true and deserve serious consideration, yet the overall picture presented to the audience is erroneous at best and outright disingenuous at worst. While men’s issues require genuine advocacy, the heroes of this pathetic diatribe tend to be rather unsavory characters.

http://thelinfieldreview.com/20367/archive/opinion/choking-on-the-red-pill/

(via the-grey-tribe)
If only there were some organization for gender equality that could have addressed these problems before a new group like “MRAs” formed… maybe a movement that said very many times that it is about gender equality…

gender politics uncharitable

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

More you might like