Awfully convenient that the STEM-lords who worship at the altar of “hard science” are also really likely to trust the research findings of evolutionary psychology and the study of intelligence, two of the flimsiest and most disputed scientific disciplines around.
The reason they are considered flimsiest and most disputed is because the findings may not necessarily be progressive in the first place so that’s just putting the cart before the horse
If we are talking about social sciences, people still quote as fact defining all of human condition studies that completely failed to replicate, and that’s for some reason not controversial
TBH it’s good we’re not so far off from genetic modification and other exotic technologies, since it’s looking like some of the things that weren’t supposed to be true (especially given some of the original motives) are one half to one quarter true, which is really inconvenient.
