i was as pissed as anybody about banning iranians but idk why ppl get so upset about the wall? Like there was this sign on the university like “NO BAN NO WALLS” well no ban sure but illegal immigration from mexico is already banned idk the big deal about a wall, i aske dsomeone and they were like “it’s a waste of money” and that’s TOTALLY not what people are complaining about when they say “NO BAN NO WALLS”, or they’d be elsewhere writing “NO BAN NO EXPENSIVE DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS”
It’s banned as a matter of law, but if you read between the lines it’s something the US basically allows for multiple reasons.
Let’s say you had a piece of property that was yours, but for years you generally ignored it and let people wander through it or do whatever. After years this, people built their lives around being able to do this. Then one day, you show up and get everyone there arrested for trespassing and build a wall around it. That’s a fairly good analogy.
(I should point that this is a problem that is specifically addressed in legal systems through the concept of “Adverse Possession”)
If the Democrats weren’t either deliberately planning “Demographic Destiny” or just celebrating it, I’d be far less sympathetic to the pro-Wall position. Trump voters have judged that the only way to get a handle on immigration in this country is to build a physical barrier that is politically inconvenient to remove - and based on the level of quiet support for Open Borders among prominent Democrats and the like, I don’t see that they’re wrong about that.
Open Borders WILL create a World Government unless it is fought. If a giant dumb wall buys us another ten or twenty years without a World Government, then so be it.
