1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
mutant-aesthetic

Anonymous asked:

Theresa May killed more than 50 kids. Thatcher killed more than 50 kids. Clinton killed more than 50 kids. Trump killed more than 50 kids. Just realize the facts for once.

mutant-aesthetic answered:

Pizzagate isn’t real, anon

mitigatedchaos

Friend Anon probably means the exercise of state power, and is some kind of Anarchist or Communist who, if actually given power, would end up causing a lot more people to die, tbh.

More you might like

ranma-official
theonion: “SAN FRANCISCO—In an effort to reduce the number of unprovoked hostile communications on the social media platform, Twitter announced Monday that it had added a red X-mark feature verifying users who are in fact perfectly okay to harass....
theonion

SAN FRANCISCO—In an effort to reduce the number of unprovoked hostile communications on the social media platform, Twitter announced Monday that it had added a red X-mark feature verifying users who are in fact perfectly okay to harass. “This new verification system offers users a simple, efficient way to determine which accounts belong to total pieces of shit whom you should have no qualms about tormenting to your heart’s desire,” said spokesperson Elizabeth James, adding that the small red symbol signifies that Twitter has officially confirmed the identity of a loathsome person who deserves the worst abuse imaginable and who will deliberately have their Mute, Block, and Report options disabled. “When a user sees this symbol, they know they’re dealing with a real asshole who has richly earned whatever mistreatment they receive, including profanity, body-shaming, leaking of personal information, and relentless goading to commit suicide. It’s really just a helpful way of saying to our users, ‘This fuck has it coming, so do your worst with a clear conscience and without fear of having your account suspended.’” At press time, Twitter reassuredly clarified that the red X was just a suggestion and that all users could still be bullied with as little recourse as they are now.

Source: theonion queue
slartibartfastibast
mitigatedchaos

The less smug you are, (and the less unethical you are), the less it stings when your most unethical behavior comes to light.

It’s good standard practice to avoid using “wit” (and snark) on people because they are low-status (”gross,” “smelly,” “ugly,” “fat harpy” and so on).  First of all, it’s just not a good mental hygiene habit.  Second of all, it cannot then come back to haunt you.

the culture war slurs cw

It seems my futurism was a little too spicy for [cyberpunk aesthetic blog #778] to handle~

Vanilla Leftism isn’t on enough layers of meta-contrarianism to provide new insight, honey.  Do try to keep up.

(That or a Tumblr error.  But it seems fairly consistent.)

blog drama
See this in the app Show more
Top Photos