Anonymous asked:
argumate answered:
you would think trees, but no.
WE WILL PAVE THE OCEAN WITH TREES!
WE WILL PAVE THE DESERT WITH TREES!
Anonymous asked:
blackblocberniebros answered:
Uh, for what?
“Hello, FBI anonymous tip hotline?”
“Yes, hello, I’m seeing this guy on social media who says crime is good. I’d like to report this.”
He stole time from a cop store. This is incredible praxis. Well ahead of yours. Step up.
Anonymous asked:
“My Opinion” (Pixels on Tumblr)
- Anonymous (2017)
Anonymous asked:
bambamramfan answered:
Thanks! That’s not really a question though. And mostly that makes me wonder “why?”
(Also I guess, why is this anonymous? Is liking my blog some dark secret?)
Which reminds me, why do people follow without liking or reblogging some posts. It always makes me curious “what did I just say to make you follow me now?” Instead they just seem to spontaneously come out of the aether.
Sometimes a post is insightful enough to be worth reading but one does not agree enough to endorse it.
Anonymous asked:
argumate answered:
Current representative democracy doesn’t give voters any direct influence over specific policy questions, literal direct democracy makes them vote on every issue, and most people suggest a sensible hybrid where everyone votes on every issue but you can delegate your vote to representatives at varying levels of pickiness.
Scrap the existing legislature and replace it with a legislature of think-tanks to whom voters delegate votes across twelve categories.
while some extremist blogs are an endless source of entertainment I’m feeling a bit uneasy about contributing to possible dogpiles and trust that people won’t send them anonymous obnoxious shit; if you’re not willing to put your own name on something it’s probably best not to send it in the first place.
Endorsed, more or less. As a matter of public record, don’t send mean anons to people I’m arguing with.
SAN FRANCISCO—In an effort to reduce the number of unprovoked hostile communications on the social media platform, Twitter announced Monday that it had added a red X-mark feature verifying users who are in fact perfectly okay to harass. “This new verification system offers users a simple, efficient way to determine which accounts belong to total pieces of shit whom you should have no qualms about tormenting to your heart’s desire,” said spokesperson Elizabeth James, adding that the small red symbol signifies that Twitter has officially confirmed the identity of a loathsome person who deserves the worst abuse imaginable and who will deliberately have their Mute, Block, and Report options disabled. “When a user sees this symbol, they know they’re dealing with a real asshole who has richly earned whatever mistreatment they receive, including profanity, body-shaming, leaking of personal information, and relentless goading to commit suicide. It’s really just a helpful way of saying to our users, ‘This fuck has it coming, so do your worst with a clear conscience and without fear of having your account suspended.’” At press time, Twitter reassuredly clarified that the red X was just a suggestion and that all users could still be bullied with as little recourse as they are now.
I swear to god he has some kind of ancient Egyptian curse. There is always, always one of these whenever something happens. He stole an amulet from a tomb or some shit.
