Anonymous asked:
argumate answered:
when fascism comes to America it will label America as fascist already, and offer itself as the cure.
How is fascism going to survive past 2040 when whites are literally no longer even the majority and the GOP has lost the majority vote in every demographic outside of white voters?
Fascists can juke and dance all they want but if they can’t get the majority vote of POCs and women I’m not seeing a long-term future for them. Those numbers make for a very high and deep wall.
The definition of White has expanded in previous eras. Trump’s goal of reducing immigration will help slow the rate of demographic transition, which will help the right-wing since many immigrants often slowly become more anti-immigration over time.
There are two other options, which can potentially be pursued simultaneously.
(tagging @sighinastorm since you reblogged the previous one.)
I’m an anarchosocialist, not a neolib. Don’t “*I* will be forced to fight them” me, like you’re some kind of hero. Their ideology is already out of date for being morally wrong, saying genetic technology is what will end them implies that the genetic “problems” they present actually need solutions. Violence against fascists is the only option against fascists. They cannot be debated since their ideology is grounded in hatred not logic, they cannot be appeased as they will always ask for more, they have to brutally crushed/scared into disbanding.
And while fascism is rising in America, antifascism is rising much faster, and hopefully they will come to an inevitable conflict in which fascism is finally wiped from the earth.
I usually don’t like comparing current events in American politics to fascism bc I feel like only 5% of people who do that actually know what fascism entails and the word has been thrown around in political discourse for decades to mean “this person or idea I don’t like” but…….. this is textbook fascism yall……
from a person who lives in a country where this happened: don’t let this happen
I sure as hell don’t support postponing the election.
a libertarian who likes fascism or nationalism was never a libertarian to begin with. they were conservatives using the label much like the libertarian party is just about weed and cia shill coporation
This is ideology, not religion. People’s minds are capable of evolution.
how is fascism evolution? are you high on meth?
9 out of 10 ideologies are better than libertarianism, the other is communism.
Future purged brown shirt found.
We’ll be doing the purging actually.
You don’t get it. You all be purged by your own fascist leaders or left for dead in the next Stalingrad. You are a moron. Every fascist state lead to self implosion and lost every war. You are a dumb ass.
So nationalism of any kind, including liking living in Texas rather than California is bad?
Name one instance where nationalism has not led to war or state violence.
This is a bad point because even without nationalism there is still war and violence
blaming nationalism for violence is like blaming religion for violence
Wrong. Nationalism emphasizes conflict, the other, and war. It can only survive on external and internal threats
Name one instance of immune system function that has not lead to microscopic violence.
To put it simply, in this world, an ideology can only be physically instantiated if a sufficiently large, well-armed, well-organized, and well-resourced group are willing to literally fight to the death to ensure it is so. They may not actually have to fight to the death, but the credibility of the threat must be there.
Libertarianism will not be instantiated if the culture does not support it. It doesn’t matter how “objectively moral” it is. If people with the means to enforce their views do not want it, it will not happen.
I don’t particularly care for Libertarianism except as a counter-weight, but it’s easy to see that some Libertarians have noticed that the cultural demographics matter when it comes to whether or not there will be Libertarianism.
Why do so many leftists, reasonably intelligent (and possibly very socially intelligent) people, write posts about talking-to-upper-class-conservatives that sound like lessons on how to inadvertantly radicalize people into fascism?
If all you have is a hammer and sickle, every problem starts to look like a wheat field
That is the most bizarrely mixed metaphor to date. Especially because what’s the hammer for?
smashing the state obvi
The hammer is for wheat farming why do you think they had so much famine
Must admit, the endless fascist vs. communist schtick that Tumblr has going on gets a little tiresome. Why must everyone be so uncreative?
unfortunately posts complaining about endless fascism vs. communism debates are now more overplayed than those debates themselves.
struggling to go up another meta level here lads
We need a new object level debate to meta on, obviously. How about National Technocracy vs. Globalist Populism?
Why do so many leftists, reasonably intelligent (and possibly very socially intelligent) people, write posts about talking-to-upper-class-conservatives that sound like lessons on how to inadvertantly radicalize people into fascism?
If all you have is a hammer and sickle, every problem starts to look like a wheat field
That is the most bizarrely mixed metaphor to date. Especially because what’s the hammer for?
Whacking square pegs into round holes.
Anonymous asked:
mutant-aesthetic answered:
who
A nefarious Russian, paid by the Putin regime to spread vile ~Liberalism~ (which everyone knows is really secretly reactionary Fascism) throughout the world, undermining the socialist world peoples’ revolution.
Communism is for cum people
Fascism is for gay people
Ah yes, the extremely pro gay Communists. The Communist utopia where LGBTQ people will frolick in fields of wild flowers or whatever. Yup, those Communists. Definitely not the ones who think that homosexuality is bourgeois degeneracy or Facism itself.
SAN FRANCISCO—In an effort to reduce the number of unprovoked hostile communications on the social media platform, Twitter announced Monday that it had added a red X-mark feature verifying users who are in fact perfectly okay to harass. “This new verification system offers users a simple, efficient way to determine which accounts belong to total pieces of shit whom you should have no qualms about tormenting to your heart’s desire,” said spokesperson Elizabeth James, adding that the small red symbol signifies that Twitter has officially confirmed the identity of a loathsome person who deserves the worst abuse imaginable and who will deliberately have their Mute, Block, and Report options disabled. “When a user sees this symbol, they know they’re dealing with a real asshole who has richly earned whatever mistreatment they receive, including profanity, body-shaming, leaking of personal information, and relentless goading to commit suicide. It’s really just a helpful way of saying to our users, ‘This fuck has it coming, so do your worst with a clear conscience and without fear of having your account suspended.’” At press time, Twitter reassuredly clarified that the red X was just a suggestion and that all users could still be bullied with as little recourse as they are now.