Unfortunately, the practice has a longer history in the area of Pakistan, so even if we accept your argument that it was entirely classist (which I don’t, given that I’ve read some people who tried to report it got sent for sensitivity training), being more selective about immigration still comes out ahead on the matter.
So if your police force is too “lol class” to handle the situation, and it won’t be realistically fixed soon, then you need to plan for that when setting your other policies.
And why wouldn’t the lower classes face the brunt of the cost of blind multiculturalism? If they were the high-charisma types that are in danger from going to concerts, it would be harder to sweep under the rug.
And as you might imagine, I don’t want this sort of thing to come to America, which means putting a stop to it before, rather than after, it starts. Because the same “it will never happen” arguments are made by the same ideological groups.
So we should just allow the class stuff to slide? So that then, by golly, at least these children will be abused by grown men of their own skin tone?
And AGAIN, you seem, despite your interest in cultural preservation, willfully determined to ignore the vast cultural differences between the United States and Britain. I’ve lived in both countries and the cultural differences, especially once you leave London, are stark.
Let alone the bizarre idea that poor people are suffering from a lack of charisma.
> Specific foreign group commits specific crime at higher rate than general population, reflecting similar crimes in country of origin
> Getting police force to overcome classism a perennial problem which is difficult to fix, unlikely to be fixed soon
> Exactly what one would expect to happen ensues
So here I am suggesting a course of action that results in less of those crimes, and your accusation is that I don’t care about the number of those crimes.
And as for the charisma, obviously if they can’t make their case well enough on the news media to get the politicians to fix their problem (or rather, get the news media to even cover their case at all), then in that sense, they lack charisma. That isn’t really their fault. News media is like that. But it has to be taken into consideration.
Do tigers have charisma? Maybe not as we humans understand it. But they’re called “charismatic megafauna” because animals like tigers are the ones that draw in the donations and political capital to engage in conservation projects that include animals people don’t care as much about.
So you’re reading “poor people aren’t suave enough” when actually it’s more like “people don’t like poor people enough”.
So people are willing to talk about the Ariana Grande concert bombing. And that bridge vehicle ramming in London. But increases in other crimes will occur mostly where they aren’t priced out… which means among the poor, who will take the brunt of badly-handled multiculturalism. And thus the poor suffering the most from it isn’t any sort of disproof that culture had something to do with it.