1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
collapsedsquid
collapsedsquid

I do worry that the folks who believe the google guy had a real concern about the business consequences of google’s affirmative action policy are going to  go broke someday trying to buy the Brooklyn bridge

collapsedsquid

mitigatedchaos:  Eh, I do suspect it’s a drag on the company, but I don’t think it’s anywhere near enough to kill it.

What I want to know is, what is the business case for google donating 4 million to refugee-related organizations?  This clearly has no benefit for google and I am very concerned that they would waste their money like this.

mitigatedchaos

Right, right, PR blah blah.  Manifestbro was also writing for an intended audience, blah blah.

But of course, the people saying it has business consequences aren’t actually that naive.

If you work for Google, it’s relevant.  And if you have shares in Google, it’s relevant.  

The consequences, though, aren’t limited to just Google.  If Manifestbro is correct, it’s potentially a drag on the whole sector, depending on just what it is you want out of that sector.  

More you might like

ranma-official
theonion: “SAN FRANCISCO—In an effort to reduce the number of unprovoked hostile communications on the social media platform, Twitter announced Monday that it had added a red X-mark feature verifying users who are in fact perfectly okay to harass....
theonion

SAN FRANCISCO—In an effort to reduce the number of unprovoked hostile communications on the social media platform, Twitter announced Monday that it had added a red X-mark feature verifying users who are in fact perfectly okay to harass. “This new verification system offers users a simple, efficient way to determine which accounts belong to total pieces of shit whom you should have no qualms about tormenting to your heart’s desire,” said spokesperson Elizabeth James, adding that the small red symbol signifies that Twitter has officially confirmed the identity of a loathsome person who deserves the worst abuse imaginable and who will deliberately have their Mute, Block, and Report options disabled. “When a user sees this symbol, they know they’re dealing with a real asshole who has richly earned whatever mistreatment they receive, including profanity, body-shaming, leaking of personal information, and relentless goading to commit suicide. It’s really just a helpful way of saying to our users, ‘This fuck has it coming, so do your worst with a clear conscience and without fear of having your account suspended.’” At press time, Twitter reassuredly clarified that the red X was just a suggestion and that all users could still be bullied with as little recourse as they are now.

Source: theonion queue
slartibartfastibast
mitigatedchaos

The less smug you are, (and the less unethical you are), the less it stings when your most unethical behavior comes to light.

It’s good standard practice to avoid using “wit” (and snark) on people because they are low-status (”gross,” “smelly,” “ugly,” “fat harpy” and so on).  First of all, it’s just not a good mental hygiene habit.  Second of all, it cannot then come back to haunt you.

the culture war slurs cw
rendakuenthusiast
ragemovement

When liberals Constantly use ‘45’, ‘head cheeto’, ‘drumpf’ etc to refer to trump….I’m just like “you know it isn’t like beetlejuice, right”

obiternihili

it’s just the liberal obummer

rendakuenthusiast

It’s exactly as stupid as obummer was. Or for that matter however people made fun of Bush. Or for that matter writing “Micro$oft” with a dollar sign.

mitigatedchaos

It’s such a disgraceful way to refer to our first Meme-American President!

They need to have some cultural respect instead of just dismissing him over his unusually-saturated skin color!

Source: ragemovement shtpost this is a joke
See this in the app Show more
Top Photos