connard-cynique asked:

Do you accept of deny that the extermination of non-whites will greatly reduce crime and improve white countries way of life?

libfas answered:

Exterminating millions of people might spike the crime rate a little. You know, murder being kind of a crime and all …

[mitigatedchaos]

Look, Connard, honey, darling, pal,

There are things between “arrest man and send him to prison for putting bacon on a mosque door, where he dies, while ignoring child-grooming gangs” and “exterminate everyone that isn’t white.”

Things like “make a sex-trafficking RICO act” or even “actually enforce the law against sex offenders and don’t overlook their actions and give them only short sentences because of their ethnicity.”

I think, perhaps, this says a bit more about the failure of your imagination - including your imagination of libfas’s motivations - than libfas.

[the-grey-tribe]

“make a sex-trafficking RICO act”

Is it not already? Holy fuck this is such a common-sense bipartisan idea that I am not at all surprised this is not a thing already. After all, how can you score victories in the political theater if your opponents will completely agree that this is an obviously good idea?

[poipoipoi-2016]

One of the more interesting things that @Slartibartfastibast had been beating down is exactly this.  

Rotherham is a small industrial city of about a quarter million people, of whom ~7,000 are Pakistani.  The last count I had heard was 2,000 child sex slaves from this one small city, which, loosely eyeballing a UK population pyramid, gives me 1 in ~10-12 girls who were sex-trafficked.  Throw on modifiers like “working-class” and it’s probably somewhat higher.  (Albeit, you know, I’d love better numbers on this).  

Oh, and the last time I had looked this up, the wiki page for Rotherham had lost the “See Also“ section because it was getting too embarrassing thanks to all the OTHER nationwide child sex trafficking scandals.

---

So they finally charged one of the gangs and sent them to prison.  And it only took a year and half a million pounds to do so.  

---

And so Slart’s interesting point here was that 

1. This is not a sustainable prosecution model
   
2. One way or another, these child rape gangs are going down.  
3. If “The people in charge” don’t resolve #1, the way that #2 gets resolved is something that the British people are likely to deeply, deeply regret the very second they’ve finished the job and no sooner.  

[mitigatedchaos]

To expand or elaborate, it’s important to understand that hard right ethnonationalist movements do not arise spontaneously.  The conditions for them to do so must first exist in order to expand beyond the fringe levels of background racism radiation.

One key way to avoid giving them the opportunity to expand is to be actually virtuous.  Not “progressive virtue,” the counter-part of right-wing Christianity’s failures, but,

Rotherham graduated from just being “Neo-Nazi propaganda” to something a lot more.  This could have been prevented, by preventing, or prosecuting for, a bunch of sex crimes.

Ostensibly, we don’t like sex crimes and want them prohibited no matter which ethnicity engages in them.

So by doing what should normally have been done, a right-wing talking point and recruiting tool could have been denied.  

Yes, the hard fringe would have remained, but marginal recruitment would be down.