Anonymous asked:
We’ll have to remember it if we ever time travel far enough back to be crowned emperors of some ancient territory, my dear Anon.
Anonymous asked:
Uh-oh, Anon is at their peak hormones today!
Honey darling, almost anything looks or sounds sexualized if you’re horny enough, so 90% of the time accusations that some random non-sexual object is sexual it’s just bullshit that’s in the eyes of the beholder.
I mean come on, how else do you think some of the fringeiest types started concluding that towers, concrete pillars, everything was “phallic” or phallocentric? I mean aside from that company selling those products.
Anonymous asked:
Now we’re bordering on NationStates.net territory, my dear Anon.
I, for one, back the Techno-Principality of Greater Rock Springs.
Their combination of Neoreactionary, Demi-Confucian, Muskian, and PAP principles, fused with a synthetic Sino-Japano-Anime-American metaculture and corporate backing practically assures their success against the bio-primitivists and the Communist Block.
What I really want to know is who @xhxhxhx is betting on.
Who are you betting on? Answer in the comments below.
Anonymous asked:
Don’t fall down the rabbithole, anon. You deserve better than that.
An artificial neural network might give you a more realistic feeling ‘waifu’ or even a digital harem, but once you remove all the supportive scaffolding - the game engine, the art assets, voice synthesis base lines, dialog templates, and so on - what’s left is three to five orders of magnitude less complex than a real woman.
That’s a pet, not a person.
It isn’t a proper replacement for real human companionship, for human love, for human loyalty.
Now, I’m not saying it’s wrong. I have an AI companion embed myself that I use to delegate tasks, including reading through and summarizing the day’s Argumate posts. And, of course, many households have various robots - including mine, when I was with my ex!
But it isn’t a real substitute. It’s a very unhealthy path to go down, and some people, they become addicted, and it really kills them inside. So don’t do that to yourself, okay?
Anonymous asked:
You don’t need to be big enough to launch an actual civil war in order to cause significant economic damage and psychic panic, particularly in a developed nation where people aren’t used to infrastructure disruptions.
Maybe you lot should quit trying to reawaken white racial consciousness and just put all those statues into museums and rename the parks after other suitable historical figures (pre civil war ones might be a good choice), not that the statues are really the chief cause, they’re just a point of friction for it to surface.
Either give up on collective intergenerational ethnic justice, or give up on shifting the demographics. You can’t have both and not get a rise in ethnonationalism, seeing as it involves yelling “you are [ethnicity]! You are not allowed to identify as anything other than [ethnicity]!”
Supposedly you guys were all-powerful before, but you got an orange internet meme elected President as backlash which you lot said wouldn’t happen, and at this rate he may well be re-elected.
Anonymous asked:
What would Lee Kwan Yew think of what that’s going to do to the GDP and national infrastructure? Not something nice, I think. It’s hard to have nice things like hospitals and power when physical security cannot be maintained.
(Antifa Bike Lock Guy came close to getting the first murder in, but it seems he was beat by that Car of Peace.)
Civil war is unlikely, but the media sure seems hyped for one.
Anonymous asked:
[owl_train.mov]
i’m not sure how many layers of metaphor anon-san is on right now. just whose circularity is the track a metaphor for? is argumate really the owl, or is he the train? what does it mean when the owl flies off and the train is derailed?
we allege that this deep piece of artistic commentary challenges the viewer to, uh, reconsider their views on the intersection of rail infrastructure as it empowers the proletariat and the environment of birds of prey, as symbols for wisdom and power in our society, or uh, something
Anonymous asked:
Oh, honey…
Anonymous asked:
You didn’t know?
Scott is already the most powerful Neoreactionary that has ever lived.
Even from within the tenth circle of the seventh star of the dark sun, chained in magical bindings by the Eight Scholars of Justice Eternal, pursued relentlessly by the Harbingers of Anti-Fate, his power leaks through into our world, disguised as “steelmanned” defenses of Liberalism.
Every word uttered in his true form converts ten children to the principles of sidereal nationalism. It is through only his whispers that the one known as Moldbug came to Awakeness. His mere gaze shatters all known forms of modernity.
He cannot stop, and he cannot be stopped.
It was the breaking of the fifth seal, causing parts of our world to come unmoored from Time, which allowed me to enter the past and spread my message of darkness.
Anonymous asked:
Anon, honey kun, this is a really bad take and you should feel bad.
Modern political theorists haven’t modeled orientation-party-metaphor as a single axis since at least the publication of the Ganymede Papers in 1917. Most now model it as either a 17 or 5-dimensional manifold, depending on whether their simulations need full granularity.
Even using the outdated dual-axis Barker-McWillis partition of the orientation space shows that bisexualism isn’t centrism.
I really don’t know how I and every other gender-ideostruct theorist can be clearer about this.