1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna

Anonymous asked:

Want some extra fun? Christian here who subscribes both to annihilationism (IE, the "hell = nonexistence" doctrine you're describing) *and* quantum immortality; I call this combination quantum universalism.

While many futurists anticipated broad advances across the technological economy, in fields ranging from computing to materials science, few foresaw the radical advancements in theology that advanced quantum theory would bring.

- The Quantum Fields of God, Ned Halibut, Kansas Revival Timeline, 2308 (retrieved from Church of Mars archives 2609 with permission of Father Gregory)

perpendicular wood anons asks shtpost mitigated future chronofelony

Anonymous asked:

Shut the fuck up you sexist bitch.

Technically, this one arrived before the other one, so I think this is actually my first official anonhate.

image

I don’t have any confetti or anything up here, so you’ll just have to make do with this.

That’s not actually a real anon, by the way.  It’s an Official Tumblr™ Plush Anon.  The shipping is fucking ludicrous, though.

anons asks shtpost gendpol the mitigated exhibition supervillain nuclear moonbase victory for national technocracy what even is this blog augmented reality break

Anonymous asked:

Hating men for no reason won't solve your personal problems

I was really expecting to be accused of misogyny, actually.  I’m trying to calculate how many levels of misdirection this ask is on.

Maybe it’s about this post?

They can’t undo Toxic Masculinity, because they don’t understand Masculinity, and they don’t want to.

…because that would mean understanding things about themselves that they don’t want to understand, either.

In which the “they” is actually Mainstream Feminists.

Patterns of male behavior are in part driven by what straight women like/don’t like, or more accurately who they treat as hot/not hot, who they date/don’t date, etc.

Undoing what the Mainstream Feminists call “toxic masculinity” would mean that straight women, on average, would have to change, which would mean they’d have to first understand how cishet female preferences shape the very male power/dominance/status hierarchies they ostensibly oppose.

However, Feminism does poorly at attributing agency and power to women (beyond some of the “rah rah, girl power” stuff), as it’s more politically useful to present as the unpowered underdog.

anons asks gendpol

Anonymous asked:

There may or may not be a god. We're working on building a few of our own, to neutralise the threat posed by any preexisting gods. We hope to be in a position to withstand any divine hostilities by around 2085, but in the meantime diplomatic and economic countermeasures must make up the balance.

Man, this is a bit too close to some worldbuilding I did where, in the wake of a supervolcano eruption, a bronze-age civilization flipped from being polytheists to being anti-theists.  The Storm the Heavens and Cast Down the Golden Thrones kind of anti-theists, not the internet article writing kind. (A cult expanded in the wake of the catastrophe and became the new religion.)

They are to train over multiple reincarnations for the literal, not metaphorical, battle at the end of time.

Anyhow, the good news is that gluten has been deemed one of their unholy foods.

anons asks mitigated fiction perpendicular wood there's a good bit more to it than that

Anonymous asked:

God did exist, but He's been slowly fading out ever since He died. John Michael Greer had a good post about it: www(.)ecosophia(.)net/death-god-speculation/

Anon-kun brings us some excellent worldbuilding material.

Hey, you want to hear something?

If there are souls, and they aren’t just glorified backup devices, but are involved in our decision-making process, then the behavior of an ensouled body must be different in some way from an unensouled body.

And thus, the behavior of ensouled matter, too, must be different from unensouled matter.

The degree of difference in behavior from the hypothetical unensouled version would determine the magnitude of interference.  If it’s fairly high (and it would need to be in order to justify certain religious beliefs), then it should be detectable statistically by comparison with control atoms.

anons asks shtpost perpendicular wood

Anonymous asked:

Nazis don't exist; they just haven't accepted it yet. Guys, we dropped the Unwish on you decades ago, you're literally fading from existence, your protests actually don't matter at this point, they're just annoying. "This is unfair, the Holocaust never happened!" Yeah, because we retconned you and all of your actions away, you dumb motherfuckers. Wave your swastikas around all you like; they're becoming ghostier and less real each passing year. Can't even remember why I'm mad.

You miserable fools.

All nations reforged their national mythologies in the crucible of the Second World War.

Having transformed Imperial Japan into the sole remaining bastion of such cruel and violent Nationalism, you are about to unleash a form of weeb that not even gods can comprehend.

And now I, standing outside of Time, will be forced to watch this unfold.  You jerks.

anons asks shtpost augmented reality break politics chronofelony

Anonymous asked:

"You can't outrun hot lead" isn't even true (metaphorically speaking, still waiting for the cybernetics to hit transsonic sprint times ofc) at our current medical ability. Survival rate for GSW patients is something like 66%, rising to 90% if you're conscious on arrival at hospital. It's not the best odds, but it's a lot better than the mythology around guns makes it out to be.

He’ll really need that blood transfusion then, eh?

Too bad that blood might’ve gone to someone else who wasn’t him, resulting in a net loss of resources.  But how could an Anarchist shooting people be responsible for such a thing?

I’ll be honest, I’ve seen at least one line of posts before in which someone argued that political operatives assassinating people aren’t in any way morally liable for any resulting civil war.

There are arguments for going after billionaires, but the one provided wasn’t a very good one.

“They could warp the political system to their own ends using ‘campaign contributions’” is a far better one.

shtpost uncharitable anons asks
Top Photos