1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
funereal-disease
funereal-disease

I periodically think about that autistic man whose coworkers cut the heads off his stuffed animals, and about how they probably don’t understand even half the import of what they did. It’s not just destroying a favorite toy - the bond between an autist and their stuffed animals is something else entirely.

If somebody hurt my caterpillars, I don’t even think I’d be able to speak. Just shriek with rage.

mitigatedchaos

It strikes me, in relation to your previous post about how you were one biological accident away from being a neckbeard, that being so attached to stuffed animals would be extremely low status in a man.

gender politics
the-grey-tribe
the-grey-tribe:
“ thetransintransgenic:
“ profeminist:
“ Source
Women At Google Face ‘Extreme, Systemic’ Wage Gap, According To Labor Dept. Suit  Read Me –>The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap (Updated Spring 2017)  ”
I mean, it’s even more than...
profeminist

Source

Women At Google Face ‘Extreme, Systemic’ Wage Gap, According To Labor Dept. Suit

Read Me –>The Simple Truth about the Gender Pay Gap (Updated Spring 2017)

thetransintransgenic

I mean, it’s even more than that. They’re an advertising/data company. That’s basically their entire business model.

GOOGLE: We take pride in our business of knowing everyone’s approximate salary, age, gender, interests, browsing habits, media habits, driving/walking habits, search history, and a rough social network, and regularly do analyses and optimizations across all that data to best direct advertisements to where they will have the strongest effect.

GOVERNMENT: So. Um. How about some statistics on how much you pay female employees, then?

GOOGLE: uuuuuhhhhrrrrrrrrrrhhhh…………… data machine broek…………………?..   .

the-grey-tribe

I smell a troll concept: Argue that it’s capitalism’s fault, because paying men more on average maximises shareholder value, as men are better at programming under this system, and only under full communism, women and men can afford to be equally bad at programming.

mitigatedchaos

Comrade Bernov will herd the women into STEM, just as the ideology says must be done for the sake of justice.

Source: profeminist gender politics shtpost
sinesalvatorem
sinesalvatorem:
“ aellagirl:
“ testblogdontupvote:
“ aellagirl:
“Basically the question is “how would you feel about being raped?”
I have not a lot of women, but 84 women said ‘negatively’ and 61 said ‘positively.’ A lot of the women who respond to...
aellagirl

Basically the question is “how would you feel about being raped?” 

I have not a lot of women, but 84 women said ‘negatively’ and 61 said ‘positively.’ A lot of the women who respond to me are sex workers, so maybe that influences it? Also maybe troll men responding as women.

But 813 men said ‘positively,’ compared to only 254 who said ‘negatively.’ Out of men, 76% say they would respond positively to this rape scenario. For comparison, 42% of women would respond positively.

For disclaimer: it’s very possible a lot of people aren’t accurately able to predict their actual responses. Regardless, the gender difference is still very significant, which is my primary interest here.

I have two main thoughts here.

One, is that the “men can’t be raped” trope is based in reality. If a hot woman rapes a man he’s much more likely to like it than if a hot man rapes a woman.

Two, is that, on a very base level, the actual act is pretty similar for both parties. Mouth on genitals, sleeping, all that. There’s equivalent levels of concrete things being done. The difference in enjoyment, then, relies in how culture perceives this differently for gender. Women are conditioned to view this negatively, and men are conditioned to view this positively. The upsetness/joy is entirely in their heads, dictated by society, and is not inherently an actual harm or benefit.

(this being said, that doesn’t mean the harm or benefit felt is any less valid.)

I think this probably is very closely related to the idea that “women are gatekeepers of sex” and “men have to work to earn sex.” My question, then, is should we desire a world where nobody is a gatekeeper and everybody is joyful upon finding themselves raped, or a world where everybody is a gatekeeper and nobody enjoys rape?

testblogdontupvote

Even without looking at men, I really don’t buy the notion that 42% of women would enjoy being raped. It seems much more plausible to me that the majority of respondents of either gender are answering “does this fantasy sound hot?” instead of “what do you think would actually happen?” So this could equally well be picking up on the gender-specific prevalence of rape fantasies or gender-specific (in)ability to tell fantasies from reality.

aellagirl

I’ve asked a lot of questions, in detail, about rape fantasies (in actual surveys, not just twitter polls) and women answer positively to this much more than men. In fact, the dominance/rape/power fantasy area is the single biggest difference in sexual preferences by gender. If the responses were getting conflated with rape fantasies, I’d expect to see a discrepancy in the opposite direction.

sinesalvatorem

Honestly, my guess is that this is a matter of threateningness, and that the disparity is due to the fact that most people are cis and straight. Given that almost all cismen are physically stronger than almost all ciswomen, and you didn’t indicate that the victim was in any way restrained, I bet people of different genders would tend to have different assumptions about how much control they have over the situation.

Straight cismen would often think “OK, that’s cool, and if she does anything I’m not OK with, I can just physically shove her off of me”, while straight ciswomen think “OH MY G-D I’M TRAPPED THERE’S A HUGE PERSON ON TOP OF ME HELP”. Given that we already know the person in question is a rapist, “You will have to use physical force if you want to escape” is pretty much a given. The fact that one group of people is so shot up on naturally-produced steroids that they don’t have to worry about losing such a contest seems like enough reason for this scenario to not freak them out.

Thus, straight cismen are likely to say “negative” just when your scenario seems like an unpleasant violation, while straight ciswomen are likely to say “negative” for that reason or if they have ANY SENSE OF SELF-PRESERVATION.

(For reference, my first thought when I saw this was “Having a stranger do that sounds violating and I wouldn’t want it, but at least I can just throw that person off of me and leave the room”. If I were straight or was taking anti-androgens, I expect my response would have been quite different.)

mitigatedchaos

How many straight men are assuming they brought a woman home while drunk the night before in the question, I wonder…

Also tinged by consent issues - many women may not even think about male consent issues and thus wouldn’t think of themselves as a rapist if they did this to a guy, but might stop if told to.

Source: aellagirl gender politics rape cw
argumate
argumate:
“ argumate:
“ argumate:
“ Holy shit, Australia is less tolerant of sexual diversity than Ireland.
”
of course that was 12 months ago, and in the meantime absolutely nothing has changed on this front
”
of course that was 24 months ago, and...
argumate

Holy shit, Australia is less tolerant of sexual diversity than Ireland.

argumate

of course that was 12 months ago, and in the meantime absolutely nothing has changed on this front

argumate

of course that was 24 months ago, and in the meantime absolutely nothing has changed on this front

mitigatedchaos

Irony - roping gays into monogamous marriages is likely to decrease sexual promiscuity and rate of disease spread, while increasing family formation, social and societal stability, and mental health.

If we take degeneracy as a concept seriously, then, given that homosexuality remains at a roughly constant rate (not unreasonable), then it is literally less degenerate.

In addition to liking irony I also think the other benefits are good, so of course as the villain I am I support it, just with the caveat that polygamy is still bad.

Source: frederickengels gender politics
slartibartfastibast

neurocybernetics asked:

have you considered getting laid perhaps

ranma-official answered:

I can easily do so thanks to Tinder, but it makes my dysphoria worse.

I don’t understand what you’re getting at. What framework are you operating under where men prove their value via sexual conquests?

Could it be…


… the patriarchy?

slartibartfastibast

What? No. Proving your worth through “sexual conquest” is a sad weird modern phenomenon that emerged after proper marriage shat the bed. If anything, the patriarchy would have actively shunned manwhores.

Or is patriarchy supposed to be what happened after feminism? I’m confused. Antibiotics and birth control are very recent things.

mitigatedchaos

You must acknowledge the dominance of sexual manquest throughout history! High-status men and their behaviors are all that matters…

Source: ranma-official gender politics shtpost
ranma-official

Anonymous asked:

Knowing that (even) you can get laid with Tinder makes me feel even worse about myself. The most action I've gotten is that I went ice skating once.

ranma-official answered:

I’m reasonably attractive and can play an alpha male, so I get laid easily. I just really don’t want to, and that makes me feel like shit. When I act feminine, women shit on me too.

mitigatedchaos

tbh my running theory is that demand from neurotypical straight women is key to upholding male gender norms

gender politics
argumate
argumate

Man: *says something a little misogynistic*

Feminist Man: yeah well you wouldn’t be saying that if you just got some pussy, you fucking faggot-

in-all-conscience

I can’t tell if this is a pro-feminist post or an anti-feminist post.

argumate

it is exactly what it appears to be: pointing out that people repeat messages that claim to be feminist, but which reinforce the traditional patriarchal world-view, and indeed only make sense at all in terms of that world-view.

whether you interpret that as a a criticism of feminist ideology, or a criticism of people who claim to be feminist but aren’t really, or a criticism of the way that every ideology that gains any status at all is quickly subverted and repackaged as a harmless commodity, is entirely up to you.

I just think it’s annoying for people to go around saying the opposite of what they claim to mean, because I am a huge dork.

gender politics