1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
ranma-official
ranma-official:
“ mitigatedchaos:
“ rendakuenthusiast:
“ cisnowflake:
“ erthling91:
“Enough of the straight ones would like it that it would defeat the purpose, methinks
”
I don’t feel like they thought this comment through.
”
Some woman did this and...
erthling91

Enough of the straight ones would like it that it would defeat the purpose, methinks

cisnowflake

I don’t feel like they thought this comment through.

rendakuenthusiast

Some woman did this and wrote an article about how the straight men who received the pictures were universally pleased to receive them. I myself would not mind receiving random pictures of vaginas from random women.

mitigatedchaos

I would mind, but yes, that twitter user seriously has no idea about the dickpix senders.

ranma-official

Yeah the absolute majority of men don’t send dick pics, people who do so do so because it’s exhibitionism, and before someone segues into “well all men are responsible then” it’s not a kind of thing that comes up in conversation at all

mitigatedchaos

Even when I’m “one of the guys,” it’s never come up.

Like, “let’s make a Discord for porn lol” has come up.  Which I’ve shot down, because seriously what?  

Source: purpletangyvaginas still not revealing my gender gendpol
the-grey-tribe
unknought

I have significantly fewer reservations about labeling myself / my politics as feminist than I do about labeling myself / my politics as rationalist.

the-grey-tribe

I guess it all boils down to the question “Would you oppress women in a hypothetical world in which oppressing women was the right thing to do“

Your answer to this question is irrelevant, what matters is what you think the question means, and how you think other people want you to answer it.

mitigatedchaos

We could oppress straight women less by legalizing polygam- wait, why are the men suddenly acting all desperate and trying to take permanent ownership of women at the earliest time possible? Why are women’s mental health and education outcomes declining?? Why is civil order decreasing???

Source: unknought gendpol

@argumate

Yes, they’re going to fight over abortion, since it involves terminating human life.  You can argue whether it constitutes “persons” - which is indeed my position, not having a brain means something can’t be a person even if it’s otherwise human - but you can’t argue that a fetus is not human.

Other than that, no, it’s not going to get rolled back barring a major reduction in material prosperity.  Not unless something really dumb happens, like one of the nastier forms of Islam taking over - which, I might add, the same Social Justice activists that say they are in favor of women’s liberation, effectively insist we do nothing to stop.

The reduction in child mortality due to advanced medicine and household labor due to automation basically guarantees that the old order won’t really return. 

Who is going to cause it to return?  Social conservatives?  They’ve been losing the battle for social conservatism for at least a century.  The definition of what counts as “social conservative” is still shifting leftwards.  

“Patriarchy” such as it was arose out of material conditions, including kids dying at a ridiculous rate, so unless we’re dumb enough to bring those material conditions back, the support for it is just not going to be there.

gendpol
silver-and-ivory
mailadreapta

In the collection of rhetorician Richard Weaver’s essays entitled In Defense of Tradition, Weaver describes the different forms which propaganda can take and their intended effects. Type 1 Propaganda is the “Big Lie” of the Soviet Union or Orwell’s 1984. The nature of the “Big Lie” is that the lie should be so big and so obvious that no sane person could believe it.

Superficially, this form of propaganda would be similar to the Chinese loyalty test referred to as “Point Deer Make Horse.” The difference is how the lie is used. As a loyalty test, the “Big Lie” is meant to distinguish those who will lie from those who will not lie for the authorities. As a form of propaganda, the loyalties of the targets are already known: they are enemies. Instead, the lie is a form of psychological torture meant to degrade and demean members of the opposition. Consider the following quote from Theodore Dalrymple:

In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is…in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.

Weaver explains that this form of propaganda is aimed at demeaning, humiliating, and eroding the self-respect of those who oppose the regime. It is an expression of pure power, in that the propagandist can force the victim to repeat a doctrine that both people know is untrue. There is no potential gain for the propagandist except insofar his enemy is psychological broken and defeated. There is no intention for the “Big Lie” to have any effect outside the torture chamber.

Source.

wirehead-wannabe

*sideye at organized religion*

silver-and-ivory

@squareallworthy This might be the quote you were looking for in regards to Hillary Clinton.

isaacsapphire

So, nobody clicked through to the article I’m thinking.


The title is “Transgenderism Is Propaganda Designed To Humiliate And Compel Submission”


Basic upshot of it in quotes:


“…left-wing signaling is an arms race in which leftists are trapped by the terms of their religious status system in an escalating spiral to see who can find the most radical, most irrational expression of egalitarian ideas…


Cathedral elite know full well that transgender individuals are mentally ill and have chosen to embrace this cause for ulterior motives, as there is something inherent in the issue that provides them an advantage… this form of propaganda is aimed at demeaning, humiliating, and eroding the self-respect of those who oppose the regime. It is an expression of pure power, in that the propagandist can force the victim to repeat a doctrine that both people know is untrue. There is no potential gain for the propagandist except insofar his enemy is psychological broken and defeated…


…this propaganda is aimed at religious and socially conservative or moderate individuals who are politically centrist or center-right. The threat is implicit: either admit that the man in a dress is a woman, or we will take away your job, take away your respectability in the community, send CPS after your children, and otherwise destroy your life… examine the various media pieces about how straight men are bigots because they won’t have sex with transsexual “women:” the implicit threat here is chilling. The message from the Cathedral mouthpieces is that the time is coming when dissenters will be told that they must copulate with a transgender or be punished by the regime. What could be a greater exercise of pure power than forcing your opponents to participate in soul-destroying sexual depravity and to pretend to enjoy it?


…Transgender individuals are puppets of his system. Their ultimate fate is irrelevant to the question at hand, and any discussion on the right about “compassion” or “understanding” is a non sequitur… acting like transgenderism has anything to do with helping actual transgender individuals makes one a participant in propaganda and a willing dupe…


How many genders am I holding up, Winston?”

silver-and-ivory

Great….

mitigatedchaos

This is definitely what some conservatives actually believe.

Their understanding of gender is attributed to “genes,” but it’s actually skin deep.  They either cannot accept that hormones could go wrong at the brain sexing process even though they believe brains are sexed, or they see the phenotype as dominant and morally binding over the neurotype.

Though of course, this is shaped in part by the fact that some people just don’t pass, and barring new medical technology, never will.  Even with those that pass better, there can still be brain systems that are going “THAT IS [SEX]” subconsciously which are in conflict with hetero- (or more rarely, homo-) monosexuality.

Of course, some of the gender people are baffled by this, because they’re at least weakly bi- or pansexual, so what’s a deal-breaker for someone who is Very Straight seems like a fake concern to them, and if it’s a fake concern, then it must exist to further oppression, right?

Source: mailadreapta transphobia cw gendpol
rendakuenthusiast
rendakuenthusiast:
“ cisnowflake:
“ erthling91:
“Enough of the straight ones would like it that it would defeat the purpose, methinks
”
I don’t feel like they thought this comment through.
”
Some woman did this and wrote an article about how the...
erthling91

Enough of the straight ones would like it that it would defeat the purpose, methinks

cisnowflake

I don’t feel like they thought this comment through.

rendakuenthusiast

Some woman did this and wrote an article about how the straight men who received the pictures were universally pleased to receive them. I myself would not mind receiving random pictures of vaginas from random women.

mitigatedchaos

I would mind, but yes, that twitter user seriously has no idea about the dickpix senders.

Source: purpletangyvaginas gendpol

Anonymous asked:

watermelon-flavored strawberry, but perhaps just because of the avatar

Sometimes I’ll… hmn, how to describe, use certain twists of language or hints in order to come off one way or the other.

Someone once asked, on a post, “wait, is that a period joke?”  Yes, yes it was.  It was also several other jokes simultaneously.  But that has a certain weight to it in peoples’ gender reading intuitions.

Anyhow,

Avatars have a powerful effect on how we read people online, and lead to us making various subconscious assumptions.  Don’t worry though, I didn’t choose my avatar as a ‘gotcha’ to trip people up with.  

In an environment where gender presentation is much more of a choice than it is elsewhere, it also becomes part of communication and describing one’s intent to others, just as @wirehead-wannabe‘s rat avatar gives off a certain vibe about him, and @argumate‘s rotated pyramid is as frustratingly neutral as his posts.

So the avatar, too, is part of the message of this blog, an indicator of tone and so on, in addition to visual branding to make it recognizable and differentiate it from other blogs.

I will say that the grey is a deliberate choice as no real races are grey.  Yet.

anons asks fruit gender ask meme gendpol

Anonymous asked:

🍓 🍉 🍓 🍉 🍓 🍉 🍒🍒 🍓 🍓

Honey, darling,

You’re missing like the remaining 11/12ths necessary to describe a full neurotype matrix.  I feel cheated, here.  But I guess I can’t expect people to be living in the gender world of 2052.

I’ll just take the average.

5/10 Strawberry (F)
3/10 Watermelon (A)
2/10 Cherry (M)

An interesting reading.  I have been known to describe people, gender-wise, by ratios like this.

shtpost anons asks fruit gender ask meme gendpol mitigated future