Maybe the reason some people relate to monstergirls is because they are incapable of viewing themselves without shame.
@mitigatedchaos how about this sci-fi take on gendpol:
“Men are indeed worse than women in various ways, more antisocial, violent etc…
And we have egg-combining technology so we can make a Lesbian Utopia…
HOWEVER, we should still keep the population at approximately 50:50… For the long-term psychological benefits of romantic interaction, given most women are straight.”
You say this, but I already once did a fake nation writeup where they created a single-sex and it turned out terrible - not because they weren’t gay enough, but rather, because they embraced the worst aspects of both masculinity and femininity simultaneously. (And also, they would have been less bad off if they had just a few teaspoons of Feminism, but that wasn’t going to happen, for Reasons.)
@its-okae-carly-rae
mitigatedchaos, resident queer separatist.
You say this as a shitpost, but if we project my views into the past while keeping them semi-coherent, I would have actually suggested making a queer or gay jurisdiction as a test of just how dangerous it really is.
Instead of catcalling people, let’s catcall ducks.
In other words, the core of the problem is that women would choose the “wrong” people to marry, so they should be forcibly restricted in who they can marry for the good of society.
That is fucked up.
Given that we already live in a monogamous society, and 1) the Middle East is significantly more fucked up than our society, and 2) the proponents for polygamy will not make the necessary ideological trades in order to avoid the outcome of becoming more fucked up like the Middle East?
It doesn’t bother me.
Because the argument is generally based on “rights” and “freedoms,” the option “only let men marry stacks of women in proportion to the rate that women marry stacks of men" is not really on the table.
Oh, and, if I were in charge of the country, I would tax junk food. For your “how anti-freedom is Mitigated Chaos” calibration purposes. Additionally, I would ban new cousin marriage out to the second or third degree.
Edit: Oh, and I suppose you don’t support racial anti-discrimination laws, do you?
I’ve never been catcalled and it kind of bothers me. Like: why not? Am I just not dressing in the right way? Am I not going to the right places? What do I need to do to have this experience? I already walk home from school every day!
God but I kind of want to be catcalled, if I’m going to be mistaken for a woman at least I want to be a /desirable/ woman.
[insert standard disclaimer about catcalling not being fun]
Might I propose that cat-calling frequency varies a lot by location and local population/culture?
I will admit, when I realized that each generation must raise the next, and I mean really realized it, not just in passing, I became more right-wing.
@silver-and-ivory why did you
If some subset of society just does whatever they want, as long as it’s not too big, then it doesn’t risk imploding society.
However, for society to continue and be good to live in,
Thus, the family is, in fact, one of the primary core units of society, and of great importance. How people live, in the aggregate, matters a lot. The education and raising of children matter a lot. There is a maximum number ratio of wine-drenched spinsters and perpetual bachelors, beyond which, long-term, any nation will crumble.
How people live determines the wealth of society, the general pleasantness of society, and so on.
I feel like this is wrong but I have no idea why I feel like that, so have a reblog.
False equivalence. The right doesn’t raise their children to be more virtuous than the left. They have different vices and virtues.
Sure, in some ways. Some patterns work even when done by people who don’t believe in having others follow them.
Also, there is more than one way to be right-wing.
What’s right and left can vary, too. Polygmy is bad for children. However, while in the middle east, polygamy would be Trad, in the United States, it would be the Idpol Left that would legalize it, in the name of “religious tolerance” and a bunch of other things.
And thus, within the context of America, my opposition to it is “right-wing”.
Anonymous asked:
mitigatedchaos answered:
Rattumblr… Actually Not Really That Stunned, to Be Honest
Now, to answer this more seriously, my experience has been that a combination of similarity and complementarity is the most successful in relationships.
Anonymous asked:
Rattumblr… Actually Not Really That Stunned, to Be Honest
Anonymous asked:
I mean,
Feelz are important and a key part of our existence as human beings…
It’s just that they exist within the context of the economy, the state, geopolitics, aging, random disease, and so on.
And as such, by pragmatic concerns, there are limits for societies and not just individuals.
