1.5M ratings
277k ratings

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.

Sounds perfect Wahhhh, I don’t wanna
argumate
argumate

anaisnein said: is everyone in this set of threads under the impression that it’s perfectly fine and dandy for *women* not to display the trappings of financial success? that it has no impact at all on their perceived attractiveness? I swear every time i read one of these how gender works conversations I feel like I’m in Bizarro World or a space alien

don’t be silly, there’s no money in trying to sell expensive accessories to women

mitigatedchaos

Expensive accessories might raise the status of women among other women, but do they really help get men?

gendpol
funereal-disease
fierceawakening

http://sharkodactyl.tumblr.com/post/165166952339

totally, obnoxiously, horribly uncharitable:

can i want to fuck the monster girls tho

because i’m like them and they’re like me and we both need someone

funereal-disease

also like


“every kind of woman is sexualized”


no, they really aren’t. and the insistence that they are is very typical of a certain kind of abled feminism. the kind that insists that all women are drowning in catcalls when some women would give their left tit to be considered someone’s, anyone’s, lust object.

Source: fierceawakening monstergirl discourse gendpol
argumate
flakmaniak

@argumate on the one hand, it seems dubious to poke the bear’s nest by resurrecting the weak men post and its attenant cloud of discourse, but on the other, it’s still hilarious every year how butthurt people were about it. Potentially still are? Haven’t been paying enough attention to know if the discourse is fresh.

argumate

it’s a complicated and it takes time and careful words to unpack.

there are a few posts going around Tumblr of the form “if your friend has to drive you places because you have no car then I will be dating him, not you” followed by general acclamation; yeah girl, respect yourself, etc.

if widely held, this view guarantees one or both of these:

1. you’re damn right there will be a wage gap

2. many people will be dissatisfied with their relationship options

statements seen as being generally “pro-women” are read as non-sexist, even if they have implications which are exceedingly sexist.

for groups to be equal, individuals must be equal; if there is a preference for inequality at the individual level, it’s going to drive inequality at the group level.

one cannot complain about people reacting to an incentive structure that you yourself participate in creating.

Source: flakmaniak gendpol

Although admittedly the complaints that “WHY WONT WOMEN MARRY A STACK OF HUSBANDS SO THAT I CAN MARRY A STACK OF WIVES??!!” would be funny. But on some level the people that would want polygamy would either know this or be too huffed on the moral justification for it, so they would never agree to this weird ideological compromise.

gendpol
isaacsapphire
The ultimate approach is to take advantage of the fact that they already control the food and water supply of their employees, and simply dose them with plastics until they achieve the desired gender balance.

(via rationalists-out-of-context)

Putting the humor aside – this does create awkward questions for the trans discourse.  I mean, in a hypothetical world where Google has achieved rough gender parity, but 90% of the women are trans women, would that actually be taken as resolving the problem that people are complaining about?

(Yes, I understand that not enough people are trans for this to be more than a hypothetical.  Least convenient possible parallel universe…)

As long as the intentional dosing plan was secret, or merely crackpot rumors, yeah, if anything that would be more satisfactory than an even ratio of biowomen, to literally everyone except the radfems/second wavers and conservatives who disapprove of both women in the workplace and trans people.

(via isaacsapphire)

This is why one should not say “achieving gender parity at Google is my terminal value.”

Source: rationalists-out-of-context gendpol

When talking about monstergirls, we are talking about something that is both greater and lesser than human.  More powerful, sometimes overwhelmingly so, while also more animalistic and wild.  Sexual, enthusiastic, playful.

What men want, the longing in their hearts, is to be wanted.  To be validated, in the only way that masculinity can be.

The straight female fantasy of her own overwhelming desirability taming a terrifying and powerful, yet handsome and charming creature, more masculine than any mere man, and monopolizing it to her own ends, is matched in its male mirror.

gendpol monstergirls im actually twelve monstergirls pretending to be a human blogger half shtpost

Anonymous asked:

I feel like there should be distinct genres for obviously nonhuman monstergirls (like harpies, the ones with giant snake torsos, Girls From The Black Lagoon assuming that's a thing, it should, that'd be cool) and monstergirls who, though actually nonhuman, use some form of illusion magic or shapeshifting to appear fully human (and possibly their real form isn't even vaguely humanoid). The former is really cool, but the latter is My Thing. I hope that doesn't make me a normie.

This is the kind of Discourse that people come to Tumblr for.

anons asks gendpol im actually twelve monstergirls pretending to be a human blogger monstergirls
Top Photos